Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36874205›Full record

ArticleClinical epidemiology2023

Identifying Recurrences Among Non-Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Using National Health Data Registries: Validation and Optimization of a Registry-Based Algorithm in a Modern Danish Cohort.

Jesper Nors, Trine Block Mattesen, Deirdre Cronin-Fenton, Aurélie Mailhac, Jesper Bertram Bramsen, Kåre Andersson Gotschalck, Rune Erichsen, Claus Lindbjerg Andersen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Detecting cancer recurrence in general practice: a Danish national cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  4. Clinical assessment of recurrent cancer: a Danish cohort study in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jesper Nors *Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9104-7263
Trine Block Mattesen *Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8608-8589
Deirdre Cronin-FentonDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9738-2284
Aurélie MailhacDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5606-0139
Jesper Bertram BramsenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2084-0336
Kåre Andersson GotschalckDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5119-2231
Rune ErichsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9398-9185
Claus Lindbjerg AndersenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7406-2103
Aarhus University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrence is not routinely recorded in Danish health data registries. Here, we aimed to revalidate a registry-based algorithm to identify recurrences in a contemporary cohort and to investigate the accuracy of estimating the time to recurrence (TTR). Patients and Methods: We ascertained data on 1129 patients operated for UICC TNM stage I-III CRC during 2012-2017 registered in the CRC biobank at the Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Individual-level data were linked with data from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database, Danish Cancer Registry, Danish National Registry of Patients, and Danish Pathology Registry. The algorithm identified recurrence based on diagnosis codes of local recurrence or metastases, the receipt of chemotherapy, or a pathological tissue assessment code of recurrence more than 180 days after CRC surgery. A subgroup was selected for validation of the algorithm using medical record reviews as a reference standard. Results: We found a 3-year cumulative recurrence rate of 20% (95% CI: 17-22%). Manual medical record review identified 80 recurrences in the validation cohort of 522 patients. The algorithm detected recurrence with 94% sensitivity (75/80; 95% CI: 86-98%) and 98% specificity (431/442; 95% CI: 96-99%). The positive and negative predictive values of the algorithm were 87% (95% CI: 78-93%) and 99% (95% CI: 97-100%), respectively. The median difference in TTR (TTR Conclusion: The algorithm detected recurrence and TTR with high precision in this contemporary cohort. Restriction to chemotherapy codes from oncology departments using department classifications improves the algorithm. The algorithm is suitable for use in future observational studies.

Indexed as

chemotherapyoncologysurveillancetime to recurrence

Identifiers

PMID36874205
PMCPMC9983442
OpenAlexW4322505216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.