Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36874198›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2023

Antibacterial potential and synergistic interaction between natural polyphenolic extracts and synthetic antibiotic on clinical isolates.

Sania Atta, Durdana Waseem, Humaira Fatima, Iffat Naz, Faisal Rasheed, Nosheen Kanwal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Chemical Characteristics and Antimicrobial Activity ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Active Packaging Films from PBAT/PLA withMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sania AttaDepartment of Pharmacy, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan.
Durdana WaseemShifa College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Jaffer Khan Jamali Road, H-8/4, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Humaira FatimaDepartment of Pharmacy, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan.
Iffat NazDepartment of Biology, Science Unit, Deanship of Educational Services, Qassim University, Buraidah 51452, Saudi Arabia.
Faisal RasheedPatients Diagnostic Lab, Isotope Application Division, Pakistan Institute of Nuclear Science And Technology (PINSTECH), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Nosheen KanwalDepartment of Biochemistry, Science Unit, Deanship of Educational Services, Qassim University, Buraidah 51452, Saudi Arabia.
Qassim University · SAQuaid-i-Azam University · PKPakistan Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology · PKShifa Tameer-e-Millat University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergence of antimicrobial resistance complicates treatment of infections by antibiotics. This has driven research on novel and combination antibacterial therapies. The present study evaluated synergistic antimicrobial activity of plant extracts and cefixime in resistant clinical isolates. Preliminary susceptibility profiling of antibiotics and antibacterial activity of extracts was done by disc diffusion and microbroth dilution assays. Checker-board, time-kill kinetics and protein content studies were performed to validate synergistic antibacterial activity. Results showed noteworthy quantities of gallic acid (0.24-19.7 µg/mg), quercetin (1.57-18.44 µg/mg) and cinnamic acid (0.02-5.93 µg/mg) in extracts of plants assessed by reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC). Gram-positive (4/6) and Gram-negative (13/16) clinical isolates were intermediately susceptible or resistant to cefixime, which was used for synergistic studies. EA and M extracts of plants exhibited total synergy, partial synergy and indifferent characteristics whereas aqueous extracts did not show synergistic patterns. Time-kill kinetic studies showed that synergism was both time and concentration-dependent (2-8-fold decrease in concentration). Bacterial isolates treated with combinations at fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) showed significantly reduced bacterial growth, as well as protein content (5-62 %) as compared to extracts/cefixime alone treated isolates. This study acknowledges the selected crude extracts as adjuvants to antibiotics to treat resistant bacterial infections.

Indexed as

Antibacterial activityAntimicrobial resistanceCrude extractsMultidrug-resistanceSynergismTime-kill kinetics

Identifiers

PMID36874198
PMCPMC9975697
OpenAlexW4320717333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.