Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36874170›Full record

ArticleGeoHealth2023

Effects of Desert Dust and Sandstorms on Human Health: A Scoping Review.

Kaung Suu Lwin, Aurelio Tobias, Paul Lester Chua, Lei Yuan, Ramita Thawonmas, Sophearen Ith, Zin Wai Htay, Lin Szu Yu, Lisa Yamasaki, Marta Roqué and 7 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in GeoHealth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Impact of Saharan Dust andInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. The Effects of Dust Storms on People Living in Beijing: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Kaung Suu LwinDepartment of Global Health Policy Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Aurelio TobiasInstitute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research Spanish Council for Scientific Research Barcelona Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6428-6755
Paul Lester ChuaDepartment of Global Health Policy Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Lei YuanDepartment of Global Health Policy Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Ramita ThawonmasDepartment of Global Health Policy Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Sophearen IthDepartment of Global Health Policy Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Zin Wai HtayDepartment of Global Health Policy Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Lin Szu YuDepartment of Global Health Policy Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9444-8700
Lisa YamasakiDepartment of Global Health Policy Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Marta RoquéIberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB SANT PAU) Barcelona Spain.
Xavier QuerolInstitute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research Spanish Council for Scientific Research Barcelona Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6549-9899
Julia C FussellNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Environmental Exposures and Health School of Public Health Imperial College London London UK.
Kari Christine NadeauSean N Parker Center for Allergy & Asthma Research Stanford University Mountain View CA USA.
Massimo StafoggiaDepartment of Epidemiology Lazio Region Health Service Rome Italy.
Najat A SalibaFaculty of Arts and Sciences American University of Beirut Beirut Lebanon.
Chris Fook Sheng NgDepartment of Global Health Policy Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Masahiro HashizumeDepartment of Global Health Policy Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4720-1750

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Desert dust and sandstorms are recurring environmental phenomena that are reported to produce serious health risks worldwide. This scoping review was conducted to identify the most likely health effects of desert dust and sandstorms and the methods used to characterize desert dust exposure from the existing epidemiological literature. We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify studies that reported the effects of desert dust and sandstorms on human health. Search terms referred to desert dust or sandstorm exposure, names of major deserts, and health outcomes. Health effects were cross-tabulated with study design variables (e.g., epidemiological design and methods to quantify dust exposure), desert dust source, health outcomes and conditions. We identified 204 studies that met the inclusion criteria for the scoping review. More than half of the studies (52.9%) used a time-series study design. However, we found a substantial variation in the methods used to identify and quantify desert dust exposure. The binary metric of dust exposure was more frequently used than the continuous metric for all desert dust source locations. Most studies (84.8%) reported significant associations between desert dust and adverse health effects, mainly for respiratory and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity causes. Although there is a large body of evidence on the health effects of desert dust and sandstorms, the existing epidemiological studies have significant limitations related to exposure measurement and statistical analysis that potentially contribute to inconsistencies in determining the effect of desert dust on human health.

Indexed as

desert dustepidemiologyhealthsandstormscoping review

Identifiers

PMID36874170
PMCPMC9976568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.