Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36874169›Full record

ArticleGeoHealth2023

Performance of Seven Land Surface Schemes in the WRFv4.3 Model for Simulating Precipitation in the Record-Breaking Meiyu Season Over the Yangtze-Huaihe River Valley in China.

Zhenhua Di, Shenglei Zhang, Jiping Quan, Qian Ma, Peihua Qin, Jianduo Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeoHealth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhenhua DiState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology Faculty of Geographical Science Beijing Normal University Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0188-0479
Shenglei ZhangState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science Aerospace Information Research Institute Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1693-4786
Jiping QuanInstitute of Urban Meteorology China Meteorological Administration Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0209-6064
Qian MaCollege of Global Change and Earth System Science Beijing Normal University Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7573-8278
Peihua QinState Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (LASG) Institute of Atmospheric Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8305-4204
Jianduo LiCMA Earth System Modeling and Prediction Centre China Meteorological Administration Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3942-341X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2020, the Yangtze-Huai river valley (YHRV) experienced the highest record-breaking Meiyu season since 1961, which was mainly characterized by the longest duration of precipitation lasting from early-June to mid-July, with frequent heavy rainstorms that caused severe flooding and deaths in China. Many studies have investigated the causes of this Meiyu season and its evolution, but the accuracy of precipitation simulations has received little attention. It is important to provide more accurate precipitation forecasts to help prevent and reduce flood disasters, thereby facilitating the maintenance of a healthy and sustainable earth ecosystem. In this study, we determined the optimal scheme among seven land surface model (LSMs) schemes in the Weather Research and Forecasting model for simulating the precipitation in the Meiyu season during 2020 over the YHRV region. We also investigated the mechanisms in the different LSMs that might affect precipitation simulations in terms of water and energy cycling. The results showed that the simulated amounts of precipitation were higher under all LSMs than the observations. The main differences occurred in rainstorm areas (>12 mm/day), and the differences in low rainfall areas were not significant (<8 mm/day). Among all of the LSMs, the Simplified Simple Biosphere (SSiB) model obtained the best performance, with the lowest root mean square error and the highest correlation. The SSiB model even outperformed the Bayesian model averaging result. Finally, some factors responsible for the differences modeling results were investigated to understand the related physical mechanism.

Indexed as

(Rapid Radiative Transfer Model)

Identifiers

PMID36874169
PMCPMC9984165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.