Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36874044›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2023

Quiet & deadly: Painless aortic dissection.

Karan Chawla, Somya Al-Embideen, Christopher Riordan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karan ChawlaUniversity of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH 43614, USA.
Somya Al-EmbideenUniversity of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences; Department of Surgery, Toledo, OH 43614, USA.
Christopher RiordanPromedica Healthcare System; Department of Surgery, Toledo, OH 43614, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aortic dissection is a life-threatening condition that classically presents as a sudden, sharp pain with a ripping sensation. This disease is caused by a weakened area within the aortic arterial wall, which can be classified using the Stanford classifications into type A or type B dissections, depending on the location of the tear. It is described that 17.6% of patients died before arriving at the hospital, and 45.2% of patients died within 30 days of diagnosis (Melvinsdottir et al., 2016). However, 10% of patients present without pain, leading to delayed diagnosis. In this case, a 53-year-old male with prior history of hypertension, sleep apnea, and diabetes mellitus presented to the emergency department with complaints of chest pain earlier that day. However, he was asymptomatic on presentation. He had no cardiac history. He was admitted, and a subsequent workup was performed to rule out myocardial infarction. The following morning a slight bump in troponin consistent with a Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) was noted. An echocardiogram was ordered and showed aortic regurgitation. This was followed by computed tomography angiography (CTA), which revealed acute type A ascending aortic dissection. He was transferred to our facility and underwent an emergent Bentall procedure. Ultimately, the patient tolerated the surgery well and is recovering. This case is essential because it emphasizes the painless presentation of type A aortic dissection. Mis- or undiagnosed, this condition often leads to death.

Indexed as

Aortic dissectionAsymptomatic aortic dissectionDissection of the thoracic aorta

Identifiers

PMID36874044
PMCPMC9975238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.