ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
A nomogram for predicting survival in patients with skin non-keratinizing large cell squamous cell carcinoma: A study based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Construction of a risk prediction model for hypertension in type 2 diabetes: Independent risk factors and nomogram.World journal of diabetes · 2025Article
- Article
- Construction of a novel clinical nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival in patients with primary malignant adrenal tumors: a large population-based retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with non-keratinized large cell squamous cell carcinoma (NKLCSCC) at 3, 5, and 8 years after diagnosis. Methods: Data on SCC patients were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Training (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts were generated using random selection of patients. Independent prognostic factors were selected using the backward stepwise Cox regression model. To predict the CSS rates in patients with NKLCSCC at 3, 5, and 8 years after diagnosis, all of the factors were incorporated into the nomogram. Indicators such as the concordance index (C-index), area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), net reclassification index (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), calibration curve, and decision-curve analysis (DCA) were then used to validate the performance of the nomogram. Results: This study included 9,811 patients with NKLCSCC. Twelve prognostic factors were identified by Cox regression analysis in the training cohort, which were age, number of regional nodes examined, number of positive regional nodes, sex, race, marital status, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, surgery status, chemotherapy status, radiotherapy status, summary stage, and income. The constructed nomogram was validated both internally and externally. The nomogram had good discrimination ability, as indicated by the comparatively high C-indices and AUC values. The nomogram was properly calibrated, as indicated by the calibration curves. Our nomogram was superior to the AJCC model, as illustrated by its superior NRI and IDI values. DCA curves indicated the clinical usability of the nomogram. Conclusion: The first nomogram for prognosis predictions of patients with NKLCSCC has been developed and verified. Its performance and usability demonstrated that the nomogram could be utilized in clinical settings. However, additional external verification is still required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.