Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36873676›Full record

ArticleJACS Au2023

Size Selective Ligand Tug of War Strategy to Separate Rare Earth Elements.

Katherine R Johnson, Darren M Driscoll, Joshua T Damron, Alexander S Ivanov, Santa Jansone-Popova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACS Au, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modulating metal-centered dimerization of a lanthanide chaperone protein for separation of light lanthanides.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine R JohnsonNuclear Energy and Fuel Cycle Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1323-0222
Darren M DriscollChemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8859-8016
Joshua T DamronChemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3409-0190
Alexander S IvanovChemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8193-6673
Santa Jansone-PopovaChemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0690-5957
Oak Ridge National Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Separating rare earth elements is a daunting task due to their similar properties. We report a "tug of war" strategy that employs a lipophilic and hydrophilic ligand with contrasting selectivity, resulting in a magnified separation of target rare earth elements. Specifically, a novel water-soluble bis-lactam-1,10-phenanthroline with an affinity for light lanthanides is coupled with oil-soluble diglycolamide that selectively binds heavy lanthanides. This two-ligand strategy yields a quantitative separation of the lightest (e.g., La-Nd) and heaviest (e.g., Ho-Lu) lanthanides, enabling efficient separation of neighboring lanthanides in-between (e.g., Sm-Dy).

Identifiers

PMID36873676
PMCPMC9976341
OpenAlexW4317951933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.