Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36873588›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2022

Bite-to-needle Time - An Extrapolative Indicator of Repercussion in Patients with Snakebite.

Thamizhkumaran Jayaraman, Raju Dhanasinghu, Santhanam Kuppusamy, Archana Gaur, Varatharajan Sakthivadivel

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reported snakebite mortality and state compensation payments in Madhya Pradesh, India, from 2020 to 2022.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. The Chinese guideline for management of snakebites.World journal of emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thamizhkumaran JayaramanDepartment of General Medicine, Government Villupuram Medical College, Villupuram, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4431-3976
Raju DhanasinghuDepartment of General Medicine, Government Villupuram Medical College, Villupuram, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3296-7235
Santhanam KuppusamyDepartment of General Medicine, Government Villupuram Medical College, Villupuram, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-305X
Archana GaurDepartment of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1380-4679
Varatharajan SakthivadivelDepartment of General Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5691-670X
Government Medical College · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Snakebite is a significant occupational and environmental hazard in tropical countries. The treatment of snakebite includes care of the wound, supportive care, and administration of anti-snake venom (ASV). Time is crucial to reducing the morbidity and mortality of patients. This study aimed to assess the "bite-to-needle time" with morbidity and mortality of snakebites and correlate it. Patients and methods: A total of 100 patients were included. Detailed history included the time since snakebite, bite site, species of snake, and symptoms at presentation, which included level of consciousness, cellulitis, ptosis, respiratory failure, oliguria, and bleeding manifestations. "Bite-to-needle time" was noted. Polyvalent ASV was administered in all patients. Duration of hospitalization and complications, including mortality were noted. Results: The age-group of the study population was 20-60 years. About 68% were males. Krait was the commonest species (40%), and the lower limb was the commonest bite site. Within 6 hours, 36% of patients received ASV, and between 6 and 12 hours, 30%. Patients with a bite-to-needle time of under 6 hours spent less time in the hospital and experienced fewer complications. Patients with bite-to-needle times longer than 24 hours had more ASV vials, complications, hospital-stay length, and death. Conclusion: An increase in bite-to-needle time increases the chances of systemic envenomation, hence, the severity of complications or morbidity and risk of mortality increases. The necessity of timing and the value of administering ASV on time must be emphasized to the patients. How to cite this article: Jayaraman T, Dhanasinghu R, Kuppusamy S, Gaur A, Sakthivadivel V. Bite-to-needle Time - An Extrapolative Indicator of Repercussion in Patients with Snakebite. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(11):1175-1178.

Indexed as

Antisnake venomBite-to-needle timeComplicationsMortalitySnakebite

Identifiers

PMID36873588
PMCPMC9983646
OpenAlexW4307867046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.