Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36873501›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Does farmland inflow improve the green total factor productivity of farmers in China? An empirical analysis based on a propensity score matching method.

Lin Li, Jiliang Han, Yuchun Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lin LiCollege of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China.
Jiliang HanCollege of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China.
Yuchun ZhuCollege of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Promoting the "double security" of agricultural economy and ecology is the key to the agricultural modernization strategy, and the large-scale development of agriculture is an essential way for modern agriculture. Based on the micro-survey of 697 corn growers from August to September 2020 in China, the super-efficiency SBM model was used to calculate farmers' green total factor productivity. We further used the propensity score matching method to identify the impact of farmland inflow on farmers' green total factor productivity and dissect the internal mechanism. The study found that: firstly, compared with the non-inflowed households, the green total factor productivity of the inflowed households increased by 14.66%; secondly, farmland inflow can significantly improve farmers' green total factor productivity through the marginal output leveling effect, transaction benefit effect, and technology adoption effect; thirdly, the influence of farmland inflow on the green total factor productivity of farmers has heterogeneity in age, identity, and geographical location. Therefore, governments should establish a differentiated farmland inflow mechanism according to local conditions, enhance factor mobility and soil fertility monitoring capabilities, and drive a "win-win" between economic development and ecological protection.

Indexed as

ChinaFarmersFarmland inflowGreen total factor productivityPropensity score matching

Identifiers

PMID36873501
PMCPMC9981913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.