Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36873497›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2023

Commercial device-based hand rehabilitation systems for stroke patients: State of the art and future prospects.

Bo Sheng, Jianyu Zhao, Yanxin Zhang, Shengquan Xie, Jing Tao

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Physiotherapy in Your Pocket: Effectiveness of Home Exercises Using an AI-Based Smartphone App for the Postoperative Follow-Up of Hand Injuries - A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Study].Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse : Organ der V... · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Bo ShengSchool of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation, Shanghai University, 99 Shangda Road, Baoshan, Shanghai, China.
Jianyu ZhaoSchool of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation, Shanghai University, 99 Shangda Road, Baoshan, Shanghai, China.
Yanxin ZhangDepartment of Exercise Sciences, The University of Auckland, 4703906, Newmarket, Auckland, New Zealand.
Shengquan XieSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, 3 LS2 9JT, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Jing TaoSchool of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation, Shanghai University, 99 Shangda Road, Baoshan, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai University · CNUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various hand rehabilitation systems have recently been developed for stroke patients, particularly commercial devices. Articles from 10 electronic databases from 2010 to 2022 were extracted to conduct a systematic review to explore the existing commercial training systems (hardware and software) and evaluate their clinical effectiveness. This review divided the rehabilitation equipment into contact and non-contact types. Game-based training protocols were further classified into two types: immersion and non-immersion. The results of the review indicated that the majority of the devices included were effective in improving hand function. Users who underwent rehabilitation training with these devices reported improvements in their hand function. Game-based training protocols were particularly appealing as they helped reduce boredom during rehabilitation training sessions. However, the review also identified some common technical drawbacks in the devices, particularly in non-contact devices, such as their vulnerability to the effects of light. Additionally, it was found that currently, there is no commercially available game-based training protocol that specifically targets hand rehabilitation. Given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, there is a need to develop safer non-contact rehabilitation equipment and more engaging training protocols for community and home-based rehabilitation. Additionally, the review suggests the need for revisions or the development of new clinical scales for hand rehabilitation evaluation that consider the current scenario, where in-person interactions might be limited.

Indexed as

Commercial rehabilitation systemEvaluationGame-based training protocolHand rehabilitationStroke

Identifiers

PMID36873497
PMCPMC9982629
OpenAlexW4319870670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.