ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
Surgical resection of intracranial cavernous hemangioma located at uncommon location: Clinical presentation and management.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The rare case of optic nerve cavernoma: A case report depicting the diagnostic challenge.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intracranial cavernous hemangiomas (CHs) usually originate from the cerebral and cerebellar hemispheres, while the clinical features and optimum treatment of CHs that originate from atypical locations remain unclear. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of CHs that originated from the sellar, suprasellar, or parasellar region, the ventricular system, the cerebral falx, or the meninges in patients who underwent surgery from 2009 to 2019 in our department. Results: In our study, fourteen patients with pathologically confirmed CHs in uncommon locations (UCHs) were enrolled; 5 were located at the sellar or parasellar region, 3 at the suprasellar region, 3 at the ventricular system, 2 at the cerebral falx, and 1 originated from parietal meninges. The most common symptoms were headache and dizziness (10/14); however, none presented with seizures. All UCHs located in the ventricular systems and 2 of the 3 UCHs located in the suprasellar region manifested as hemorrhagic lesions and shared similar radiological features compared with axial CHs; other locations of UCHs did not have a "popcorn" appearance on T2-weighted image. Nine patients achieved GTR, 2 achieved STR, and 3 achieved PR. Four out of five patients who received incomplete resection underwent adjuvant gamma-knife radiosurgery. During the average follow-up of 71.1 ± 43.3 months, no patient died and one patient encountered recurrence and Conclusion: We suggest that surgery is the optimum therapeutic method for UCHs located at the ventricular system, dura mater, and cerebral falx. Stereotactic radiosurgery plays an important role in the treatment of UCHs located at the sellar or parasellar region and remnant UCHs. Favorable outcomes and lesion control could be achieved by surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.