ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
A novel simulator-based checklist for evaluating residents' competence in cerebral angiography in China.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validation of simulator-based neuroangiographical training.Brain & spine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nowadays, with the fast-increasing demand for neuro-endovascular therapy, surgeons in this field are in urgent need. Unfortunately, there is still no formal skill assessment in neuro-endovascular therapy in China. Methods: We used a Delphi method to design a newly objective checklist for standards of cerebrovascular angiography in China and evaluated its validity and reliability. A total of 19 neuro-residents with no interventional experience and 19 neuro-endovascular surgeons from two centers (Guangzhou and Tianjin) were recruited; they were divided into two groups: residents and surgeons. Residents completed a simulation-based cerebrovascular angiography operation training before assessment. Assessments were under live and video record forms with two tools: the existing global rating scale (GRS) of endovascular performance and the new checklist. Results: The average scores of residents were significantly increased after training in two centers ( Conclusion: The newly developed checklist appears reliable and valid for evaluating the technical performance of cerebral angiography and differentiating between trained and untrained trainees' performance well. For its efficiency, our method has been proven to be a feasible tool for resident angiography examination in certification nationwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.