Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36873375›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2023

Immunogenicity of CRISPR therapeutics-Critical considerations for clinical translation.

Radwa Ewaisha, Karen S Anderson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. 3D Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/dCas Systems.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Precision modification of heart failure signaling by CRISPR-Cas9 base editing.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. CRISPR Interference to Inhibit Oncogenes for Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Radwa EwaishaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Karen S AndersonCenter for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR offers new hope for many patients and promises to transform the way we think of future therapies. Ensuring safety of CRISPR therapeutics is a top priority for clinical translation and specific recommendations have been recently released by the FDA. Rapid progress in the preclinical and clinical development of CRISPR therapeutics leverages years of experience with gene therapy successes and failures. Adverse events due to immunogenicity have been a major setback that has impacted the field of gene therapy. As several

Indexed as

Cas9clinical translationclinical trialsCRISPR-Casgene therapygenome editingimmunogenicity

Identifiers

PMID36873375
PMCPMC9978118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.