Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36873211›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Measuring resilience by cognitive diagnosis models and its prediction of 6-month quality of life in Be Resilient to Breast Cancer (BRBC).

Mu Zi Liang, Peng Chen, M Tish Knobf, Alex Molassiotis, Ying Tang, Guang Yun Hu, Zhe Sun, Yuan Liang Yu, Zeng Jie Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The mediating role of attribution style between psychological predictors and resilience in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mu Zi LiangGuangdong Academy of Population Development, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Peng ChenBasic Medical School, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China.
M Tish KnobfSchool of Nursing, Yale University, Orange, CT, United States.
Alex MolassiotisCollege of Arts, Humanities and Education, University of Derby, Derby, United Kingdom.
Ying TangInstitute of Tumor, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Guang Yun HuSchool of Nursing, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zhe SunThe First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yuan Liang YuMental Health Education and Counseling Center, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zeng Jie YeSchool of Nursing, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The application of advanced Cognitive Diagnosis Models (CDMs) in the Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) is limited due to its complex statistics. This study was designed to measure resilience using CDMs and its prediction of 6-month Quality of Life (QoL) in breast cancer. Methods: A total of 492 patients were longitudinally enrolled from Be Resilient to Breast Cancer (BRBC) and administered with 10-item Resilience Scale Specific to Cancer (RS-SC-10) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B). Generalized Deterministic Input, Noisy "And" Gate (G-DINA) was performed to measure cognitive diagnostic probabilities (CDPs) of resilience. Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) and Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) were utilized to estimate the incremental prediction value of cognitive diagnostic probabilities over total score. Results: CDPs of resilience improved prediction of 6-month QoL above conventional total score. AUC increased from 82.6-88.8% to 95.2-96.5% in four cohorts (all Conclusion: CDPs of resilience contribute to a more accurate prediction of 6-month QoL above conventional total score. CDMs could help optimize Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) measurement in breast cancer.

Indexed as

6-month quality of life (QoL)breast cancercognitive diagnosis models (CDMs)cognitive diagnostic probabilitiesmulticenter cohortsprediction modelresilience

Identifiers

PMID36873211
PMCPMC9978149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.