ArticleHeliyon2023
Narratives in the medicolegal field from the perspective of physicians involved in medical dispute mediation meetings in Taiwan.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Attitudinal Profiles Toward Medical Mediation Among Healthcare Professionals: Evidence from a Scenario-Based Survey and Latent Class Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Applications of Medical Mediation: A Systematic Review of Its Role in Healthcare Dispute Resolution and Bioethical Decision-Making.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Eager for an innovative path: solving the puzzle of medical dispute resolution in China combined with bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical treatment and narratives are interrelated. We examined this interrelation by evaluating the medical dispute mediation system in Taiwan. We conducted 16 semi-structured interviews with legal and administrative specialists in medical mediation and physicians involved in mediation meetings. The interview data were reproduced into almost verbatim text for coding and analysis. We examined how narratives were discussed in the field of medicine and identified two approaches to narratives. One was the narrative from a patient's storytelling, that is, narrative-based medicine. The other was the narrative of medical staff, which included shared decision-making and decision aids. Discussions of these approaches revolved around the avoidance of conflicts during medical treatment. However, knowing how to handle unsuccessful medical treatment is crucial. By applying polyphony in narratives, physicians can comprehend the role of narratives in unsuccessful medical treatment, helping themselves to practice how to develop narratives to communicate with patients and their surrogates when encountering any difficulty in different stages of medical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.