Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36873161›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Narratives in the medicolegal field from the perspective of physicians involved in medical dispute mediation meetings in Taiwan.

Po-Yi Chen, Chung-Pei Fu, Chih-Chia Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Po-Yi ChenCenter for Medical Humanities Education, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan.
Chung-Pei FuDepartment of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, Taiwan.
Chih-Chia WangCenter for Medical Humanities Education, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical treatment and narratives are interrelated. We examined this interrelation by evaluating the medical dispute mediation system in Taiwan. We conducted 16 semi-structured interviews with legal and administrative specialists in medical mediation and physicians involved in mediation meetings. The interview data were reproduced into almost verbatim text for coding and analysis. We examined how narratives were discussed in the field of medicine and identified two approaches to narratives. One was the narrative from a patient's storytelling, that is, narrative-based medicine. The other was the narrative of medical staff, which included shared decision-making and decision aids. Discussions of these approaches revolved around the avoidance of conflicts during medical treatment. However, knowing how to handle unsuccessful medical treatment is crucial. By applying polyphony in narratives, physicians can comprehend the role of narratives in unsuccessful medical treatment, helping themselves to practice how to develop narratives to communicate with patients and their surrogates when encountering any difficulty in different stages of medical treatment.

Indexed as

EvidenceMediation meetingMedical treatmentNarrativePolyphony

Identifiers

PMID36873161
PMCPMC9975097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.