Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36873106›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2023

Florian P Fischer, Robin A Karge, Yvonne G Weber, Henner Koch, Stefan Wolking, Aaron Voigt

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. microPublication biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The fruit flyFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  20. A transporter's doom or destiny:Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Florian P FischerDepartment of Epileptology and Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Robin A KargeDepartment of Epileptology and Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Yvonne G WeberDepartment of Epileptology and Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Henner KochDepartment of Epileptology and Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Stefan WolkingDepartment of Epileptology and Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Aaron VoigtDepartment of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DEForschungszentrum Jülich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epilepsy is one of the most prevalent neurological disorders, affecting more than 45 million people worldwide. Recent advances in genetic techniques, such as next-generation sequencing, have driven genetic discovery and increased our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms behind many epilepsy syndromes. These insights prompt the development of personalized therapies tailored to the genetic characteristics of an individual patient. However, the surging number of novel genetic variants renders the interpretation of pathogenetic consequences and of potential therapeutic implications ever more challenging. Model organisms can help explore these aspects

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterepilepsygeneticsprecision medicinetechniquestranslational research

Identifiers

PMID36873106
PMCPMC9978166
OpenAlexW4321094754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.