Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36872949›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2023

Patient outcomes following a response biomarker-guided approach to treatment using 177Lu-PSMA-I&T in men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (Re-SPECT).

Louise Emmett, Nikeith John, Sarennya Pathmanandavel, William Counter, Maria Ayers, Shikha Sharma, Shikha Agrawal, Aron Poole, Elizabeth Hovey, Ganes Pranavan and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Quantitative PSMA PET Biomarkers for Predicting Response toJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Phase 2 Prospective Trial of Retreatment with [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Trial
  3. Fast [EJNMMI physics · 2026
    Article
  4. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Randomized Phase 2 Trial of an Extended and Flexible Dosing Schedule ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. First real-world clinical experience with [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Efficacy and safety of rechallenge with [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  11. Real-World Experience withJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Impact of PSMA PET on Prostate Cancer Management.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Louise EmmettDepartment of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, 390 Victoria Street, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
Nikeith JohnDepartment of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sarennya PathmanandavelDepartment of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
William CounterDepartment of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Maria AyersDepartment of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Shikha SharmaDepartment of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Shikha AgrawalDepartment of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Aron PooleDepartment of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7893-5293
Elizabeth HoveyFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ganes PranavanDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Canberra Hospital, Garran, ACT, Australia.
Craig GedyeCalvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Girish MallesaraCalvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Alex GuminskiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Adrian LeeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Martin R StocklerNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Adam HickeyDepartment of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Peter EuDepartment of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Anthony M JoshuaThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Megan CrumbakerGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Andrew NguyenDepartment of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Objective: This study evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) based on treatment interval adjustment utilising Design: Retrospective analysis of a clinical Methods: In all, 125 men were treated with 6-weekly Results: Overall PSA50% response rate (PSARR) was 60% (75/125), median PSA-PFS 6.1 months (95%CI: 5.5-6.7), and median OS 16.8 months (95%CI: 13.5-20.1). 35% (41/116) were classified as RG 1, 34% (39/116) RG 2, and 31% (36/116) RG 3. PSARRs by RG were 95% (38/41), 74% (29/39), and 8% (3/36); median PSA-PFS rates were 12.1 months (95%CI: 9.3-17.4), 6.1 months (95%CI: 5.8-9.0), and 2.6 months (95%CI: 1.6-3.1); and OS rates were 19.2 months (95%CI: 16.8-20.7), 13.2 months (95%CI: 12.0-18.8), and 11.2 months (95%CI: 8.7-15.6) for RG 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The median months of 'treatment holiday' for RG 1 was 6.1 months (IQR: 3.4-8.7). Nine men had received prior Conclusion: Personalising dosing regimens using early response biomarkers with Plain Language Summary: Lutetium-PSMA therapy is a new therapy for metastatic prostate cancer that is well tolerated and effective. However, not all men respond equally, with some responding very well and others progressing early. Personalising treatments require tools that can accurately measure treatment responses, preferably early in the treatment course, so adjustments to treatment can be made. Lutetium-PSMA can measure tumour sites after each therapy by taking whole body 3D images at 24 h using a small radiation wave from the treatment itself. This is called a SPECT scan. Previous work has shown that both prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and changes in tumour volume on a SPECT scan can predict how patients will respond to treatment as early as dose 2. This study demonstrates that stratifying how men are treated based on the results of the 6-week SPECT scan and PSA response potentially allows a third of men to have break in treatment and that these men have both longer time to disease progression and OS. Men with an increase in tumour volume and increase in PSA early in treatment (6 weeks) had shorter time to disease progression and OS. Men with early biomarker disease progression were offered alternative treatments early in an attempt to allow the opportunity to allow a more effective potential therapy, if one was available. The study is an analysis of a clinical programme, and was not a prospective trial. As such, there are potential biases that could influence results. Hence, while the study is encouraging for the use of early response biomarkers to guide better treatment decisions, this must be validated in a well-designed clinical trial.

Indexed as

lutetium-PSMAmetastatic prostate cancerresponse biomarkerSPECT

Identifiers

PMID36872949
PMCPMC9983078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.