Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36872871›Full record

ArticleThe Permanente journal2023

Intraoperative Radiation Therapy: A Large Integrated Health Care System's Approach and Outcomes.

Annie Tang, Jessica M Dzubnar, Jason F Kelly, Kian C Banks, Jacquelyn L Phillips, Elizabeth A Cureton, Jonathan D Svahn, Valerie Mai, Liisa L Lyon, Eva S Thomas and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Permanente journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prospects and Disadvantages of Intraoperative Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. The evolution of targeted intra operative radiotherapy in early breast cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Annie TangDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, Oakland, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6974-4356
Jessica M DzubnarDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, Oakland, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6735-1687
Jason F KellyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Kian C BanksDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, Oakland, CA, USA.
Jacquelyn L PhillipsDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, Oakland, CA, USA.
Elizabeth A CuretonDepartment of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Jonathan D SvahnDepartment of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Valerie MaiDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, Oakland, CA, USA.
Liisa L LyonThe Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, Oakland, CA, USA.
Eva S ThomasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Veronica C ShimDepartment of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Kaiser Permanente · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) may not be as effective in the community compared with clinical trials. Methods The authors reviewed data from the electronic health records of patients who received IORT between February 2014 and February 2020 at a single center within a large integrated health care system. The primary outcome was ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Results Of 5731 potentially eligible patients, 245 (4.3%) underwent IORT (mean age: 65.4 ± 0.4 years; median follow-up time: 3.5 years ± 2.2 months). According to the American Society for Radiation Oncology's accelerated partial breast irradiation guidelines based on final pathology, 51% of patients were suitable candidates for IORT, 38.4% were cautionary, and 10.6% were unsuitable. For adjuvant therapy, 6.5% had consolidative whole breast irradiation, and 66.4% received endocrine treatment. At the median follow-up time of 3.5 years, overall ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was 3.7%. Recurrences tended to be more frequent in patients who refused or did not complete endocrine treatment than in those who received it (7.4% vs 1.9%, p = 0.07). The complication rate was 14.7%, with seroma being the most common (8.2%). Discussion The IORT ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence rate of 3.7% confirms a higher-than-expected rate compared to randomized clinical trials, possibly due to less compliance with endocrine therapy. Conclusion The authors subsequently revised their IORT protocol to require endocrine treatment as a part of the IORT treatment plan and to strongly recommend adjuvant whole breast irradiation for all patients deemed cautionary or unsuitable for IORT according to the American Society for Radiation Oncology's accelerated partial breast irradiation guidelines.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedAgedCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMastectomy, SegmentalNeoplasm Recurrence, Localbreast cancercomplicationsIORToutcomesrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID36872871
PMCPMC10013716
OpenAlexW4323294842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.