ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2023
Role of artificial intelligence in determining factors impacting patients' refractive surgery decisions.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of long-term uncorrected distance visual acuity in surgically SMILE corrected myopic eyes using machine learning.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence applications in refractive error management: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of several toric intraocular lens calculators for predicting postoperative refractive astigmatism in cataract surgery: a real-world study.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To create a predictive model using artificial intelligence (AI) and assess if available data from patients' registration records can help in predicting definitive endpoints such as the probability of patients signing up for refractive surgery. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis. Electronic health records data of 423 patients presenting to the refractive surgery department were incorporated into models using multivariable logistic regression, decision trees classifier, and random forest (RF). Mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), classification accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were calculated for each model to evaluate performance. Results: The RF classifier provided the best output among the various models, and the top variables identified in this study by the RF classifier excluding income were insurance, time spent in the clinic, age, occupation, residence, source of referral, and so on. About 93% of the cases that did undergo refractive surgery were correctly predicted as having undergone refractive surgery. The AI model achieved an ROC-AUC of 0.945 with an Se of 88% and Sp of 92.5%. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the importance of stratification and identifying various factors using an AI model which could impact patients' decisions while selecting a refractive surgery. Eye centers can build specialized prediction profiles across disease categories and may allow for the identification of prospective obstacles in the patient's decision-making process, as well as strategies for dealing with them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.