SynthesisIndian journal of ophthalmology2023
Pediatric rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A meta-analysis of clinical features, surgical success rate, and prognostic factors.
Synthesis in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recurrent retinal detachment in Stickler Syndrome.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Article
- Recurrent Retinal Detachment in Stickler Syndrome.Research square · 2024Article
- Risk factors and prognosis of pediatric rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Egypt: a university hospital based study.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Outcomes of Vitreoretinal Surgery for X-Linked Retinoschisis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Current Literature.Journal of current ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is an issue of debate regarding its surgical outcomes and prognosis because of diagnosis delay, more complex etiological factors, and a higher prevalence of postoperative complications. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the anatomical and visual outcomes of pediatric RRD and the factors that influence the treatment results. This is the first meta-analysis on this subject. We searched the relevant publications in the electronic databases of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Eligible studies were included in the analysis. Anatomical success after one surgery and the final rates of success were estimated. Subgroup analysis was performed to find the rate of success in patients with different prognostic factors. This meta-analysis showed that the total rate of success after one surgery was about 64%, which implies that performing the first surgery was enough to get anatomical reattachment in most of the patients. The final anatomical rate of success was about 84%. In terms of visual acuity, the pooled results revealed statistically significant (P < 0.001) improvement in postoperative vision, with a 0.42 reduction in log of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). The final rate of success was significantly lower in eyes with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) (about 25% lower in eyes with PVR, P < 0.001) and in the presence of congenital anomalies (about 36% lower in congenital cases, P = 0.008). Myopic RRD had a significantly better anatomical success rate. In conclusion, this study shows that there is a high chance of anatomical success after pediatric RRD treatment. The presence of PVR and congenital anomalies was associated with a poorer prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.