ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2023
Graft rejection in component keratoplasty.
Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of clinical outcomes, complications and patient satisfaction following deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Evolving indications and surgical techniques for corneal transplantation at a tertiary eye care center in southern China.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Analysis of the relevant factors for corneal graft rejection in the southern Liaoning region from 2019 to 2023.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Investigation of microstructural failure in the human cornea through fracture tests.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Advancements in keratoplasty: Exploring newer techniques and imaging modalities for enhanced surgical outcomes.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological SocietyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among the various indications for keratoplasty, failed graft is one of the commonest indications in many published series. It is well known that the major cause of graft failure is endothelial rejection. In the last two decades, there has been a major paradigm shift in the surgical management of corneal diseases, and component keratoplasty has emerged from the concept of replacing the layer that is actually diseased, rather than replacing the full-thickness cornea with the traditional penetrating keratoplasty. This has resulted in improved outcomes and the risk of endothelial rejection has reduced drastically, thus expanding the survival time of the graft. In recent years, reports of graft rejection in component keratoplasty have emerged, with each having a different presentation and responding to a different line of treatment. This review aims to summarize the presentation, diagnosis, and management of graft rejections in component keratoplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.