ArticlePharmacotherapy2023
Associations between antidepressant use patterns during pregnancy and birth outcomes among periconception antidepressant users.
Article in Pharmacotherapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLittle is known about antidepressant medication use patterns during pregnancy among periconception (before and immediately following conception) users. Additionally, the associations between these patterns and birth outcomes is unclear, after taking into account underlying depression severity.
objectiveThis study describes patterns of antidepressant use among periconception users and examines associations between usage patterns and birth outcomes. STUDY
designThis retrospective cohort study included pregnant Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) members with a live birth between 2014 and 2017 and an antidepressant medication fill that overlapped the 8th week of pregnancy. Outcomes were preterm birth and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Data were extracted from KPNC's electronic health records. Modified Poisson regression was conducted.
resultsOf the 3637 pregnancies meeting inclusion criteria, 33% (n = 1204) continued antidepressant use throughout the pregnancy (refilled throughout pregnancy), 47% (n = 1721) discontinued use (no refills), and 20% (n = 712) stopped and reinitiated use (refill after 30+ day gap in supply). Women who continued use had 1.86 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.53, 2.27) times the risk of preterm birth and 1.76 (95% CI: 1.42, 2.19) times the risk of NICU admission, compared to women who discontinued use during pregnancy. Similarly, women with continued use had 1.66 (95% CI: 1.27, 2.18) times the risk of preterm birth and 1.85 (95% CI: 1.39, 2.46) times the risk of NICU admission, compared to women who stopped and reinitiated use. This relationship held when examining continuous exposure; the relationship between continuous exposure and preterm delivery was stronger in later trimesters.
conclusionsPericonception antidepressant users who continue use during pregnancy, particularly into the second and third trimesters, may be at higher risk of adverse birth outcomes. This evidence should be considered alongside the risks associated with depression relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.