Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36872574›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2023

Simulating and estimating agreement in the presence of multiple raters and covariates.

Katelyn A McKenzie, Jonathan D Mahnken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katelyn A McKenzieBiostatistics & Data Science, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8784-0509
Jonathan D MahnkenBiostatistics & Data Science, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.

Funding

RADx-UP: Improving the Response of Local Urban and Rural Communities to Disparities in Covid-19 TestingUL1TR002366 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Mario Castro, JAMES STEVEN LEEDER · 2017 to 2026
$44.3M
University of Kansas Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (KU ADRC)P30AG072973 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jaime Perales Puchalt · 2021 to 2026
$25.3M
University of Kansas Alzheimer's Disease Core CentersP30AG035982 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BURNS, JEFFREY MURRAY · 2011 to 2020
$16.6M
Heartland Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000001 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROHN, RICHARD J. · 2012 to 2015
$13.0M
Effect of Aerobic Exercise on Alzheimer's Pathophysiology in Preclinical ADR01AG043962 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BURNS, JEFFREY MURRAY · 2013 to 2018
$3.0M
Statistical developments for biomarker and diagnostic test evaluation with applications to Alzheimer's diseaseF30AG071349 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI MCKENZIE, KATELYN A · 2021 to 2024
$176k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000001NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002366NIA NIH HHS F30 AG071349NIA NIH HHS P30 AG035982NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072973NIA NIH HHS R01 AG043962
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cohen's and Fleiss's kappa are popular estimators for assessing agreement among two and multiple raters, respectively, for a binary response. While additional methods have been developed to account for multiple raters and covariates, they are not always applicable, rarely used, and none simplify to Cohen's kappa. Furthermore, there are no methods to simulate Bernoulli observations under the kappa agreement structure such that the developed methods could be adequately assessed. This manuscript overcomes these shortfalls. First, we developed a model-based estimator for kappa that accommodates multiple raters and covariates through a generalized linear mixed model and encompasses Cohen's kappa as a special case. Second, we created a framework to simulate dependent Bernoulli observations that upholds all 2-tuple pair of rater's kappa agreement structure and includes covariates. We used this framework to assess our method when kappa was nonzero. Simulations showed that Cohen's and Fleiss's kappa estimates were inflated unlike our model-based kappa. We analyzed an Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging study and the classic cervical cancer pathology study. The proposed model-based kappa and advancement in simulation methodology demonstrates that the popular approaches of Cohen's and Fleiss's kappa are poised to yield invalid conclusions while our work overcomes shortfalls, leading to improved inferences.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsComputer SimulationFemaleHumansLinear ModelsObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsAlzheimer's diseaseCohen's kappaFleiss's kappageneralized linear mixed model

Identifiers

PMID36872574
PMCPMC10599607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.