Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36872371›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2023

Integration of longitudinal deep-radiomics and clinical data improves the prediction of durable benefits to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients.

Benito Farina, Ana Delia Ramos Guerra, David Bermejo-Peláez, Carmelo Palacios Miras, Andrés Alcazar Peral, Guillermo Gallardo Madueño, Jesús Corral Jaime, Anna Vilalta-Lacarra, Jaime Rubio Pérez, Arrate Muñoz-Barrutia and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models for Cancer Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Benito FarinaBiomedical Image Technologies, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain. benito.farina@upm.es.ORCID 0000-0003-1674-5907
Ana Delia Ramos GuerraBiomedical Image Technologies, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
David Bermejo-PeláezBiomedical Image Technologies, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Carmelo Palacios MirasHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Andrés Alcazar PeralClínica Universidad de Navarra, 28027, Madrid, Spain.
Guillermo Gallardo MadueñoClínica Universidad de Navarra, 28027, Madrid, Spain.
Jesús Corral JaimeClínica Universidad de Navarra, 28027, Madrid, Spain.
Anna Vilalta-LacarraDepartment of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Jaime Rubio PérezHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Arrate Muñoz-BarrutiaBioengineering Department, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911, Leganés, Spain.
German R Peces-BarbaHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Luis Seijo MaceirasClínica Universidad de Navarra, 28027, Madrid, Spain.
Ignacio Gil-BazoCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Manuel Dómine GómezHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
María J Ledesma-CarbayoBiomedical Image Technologies, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Clinica Universidad de Navarra · ESBiomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine · ESHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias · ESFundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying predictive non-invasive biomarkers of immunotherapy response is crucial to avoid premature treatment interruptions or ineffective prolongation. Our aim was to develop a non-invasive biomarker for predicting immunotherapy clinical durable benefit, based on the integration of radiomics and clinical data monitored through early anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

methodsIn this study, 264 patients with pathologically confirmed stage IV NSCLC treated with immunotherapy were retrospectively collected from two institutions. The cohort was randomly divided into a training (n = 221) and an independent test set (n = 43), ensuring the balanced availability of baseline and follow-up data for each patient. Clinical data corresponding to the start of treatment was retrieved from electronic patient records, and blood test variables after the first and third cycles of immunotherapy were also collected. Additionally, traditional radiomics and deep-radiomics features were extracted from the primary tumors of the computed tomography (CT) scans before treatment and during patient follow-up. Random Forest was used to implementing baseline and longitudinal models using clinical and radiomics data separately, and then an ensemble model was built integrating both sources of information.

resultsThe integration of longitudinal clinical and deep-radiomics data significantly improved clinical durable benefit prediction at 6 and 9 months after treatment in the independent test set, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.824 (95% CI: [0.658,0.953]) and 0.753 (95% CI: [0.549,0.931]). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that, for both endpoints, the signatures significantly stratified high- and low-risk patients (p-value< 0.05) and were significantly correlated with progression-free survival (PFS6 model: C-index 0.723, p-value = 0.004; PFS9 model: C-index 0.685, p-value = 0.030) and overall survival (PFS6 models: C-index 0.768, p-value = 0.002; PFS9 model: C-index 0.736, p-value = 0.023).

conclusionsIntegrating multidimensional and longitudinal data improved clinical durable benefit prediction to immunotherapy treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients. The selection of effective treatment and the appropriate evaluation of clinical benefit are important for better managing cancer patients with prolonged survival and preserving quality of life.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalB7-H1 AntigenHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, MonoclonalB7-H1 AntigenImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsClinical dataClinical durable benefitDeep-RadiomicsImmunotherapyLongitudinal analysisLung cancerTreatment monitoring

Identifiers

PMID36872371
PMCPMC9985838
OpenAlexW4323266894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.