Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36871841›Full record

ReviewChest2023

Quantitative CT Scan Imaging of the Airways for Diagnosis and Management of Lung Disease.

Miranda Kirby, Benjamin M Smith

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chest, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Airway tapering in COPD.The European respiratory journal · 2024
    Article
  19. 3D airway geometry analysis of factors in airway navigation failure for lung nodules.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Miranda KirbyDepartment of Physics, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada; iBEST, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: Miranda.Kirby@torontomu.ca.
Benjamin M SmithDepartment of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY.
McGill University · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in non-smokersR01HL130506 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HERBSTMAN, JULIE BETH, SMITH, BENJAMIN M. · 2016 to 2025
$6.3M
Airway Tree Subtyping on Large Cohorts of CT Images for COPD RiskR01HL155816 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LAINE, ANDREW FRANCIS, SMITH, BENJAMIN M. · 2021 to 2024
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL130506NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL155816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CT scan imaging provides high-resolution images of the lungs in patients with chronic respiratory diseases. Extensive research over the last several decades has focused on developing novel quantitative CT scan airway measurements that reflect abnormal airway structure. Despite many observational studies demonstrating that associations between CT scan airway measurements and clinically important outcomes such as morbidity, mortality, and lung function decline, few quantitative CT scan measurements are applied in clinical practice. This article provides an overview of the relevant methodologic considerations for implementing quantitative CT scan airway analyses and provides a review of the scientific literature involving quantitative CT scan airway measurements used in clinical or randomized trials and observational studies of humans. We also discuss emerging evidence for the clinical usefulness of quantitative CT scan imaging of the airways and discuss what is required to bridge the gap between research and clinical application. CT scan airway measurements continue to improve our understanding of disease pathophysiologic features, diagnosis, and outcomes. However, a literature review revealed a need for studies evaluating clinical benefit when quantitative CT scan imaging is applied in the clinical setting. Technical standards for quantitative CT scan imaging of the airways and high-quality evidence of clinical benefit from management guided by quantitative CT scan imaging of the airways are required.

Indexed as

Lung DiseasesPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveHumansLungTomography, X-Ray Computedairway diseaseCOPDCT scanimagingquantitative imaging

Identifiers

PMID36871841
PMCPMC10792293
OpenAlexW4323044344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.