Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36871581›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023

Face to face interactions in chimpanzee (

Federica Amici, Manuela Ersson-Lembeck, Manfred Holodynski, Katja Liebal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Face to face interactions in chimpanzee (Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Face2face: advancing the science of social interaction.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Federica AmiciFaculty of Life Sciences, Institute of Biology, Human Biology and Primate Cognition, Leipzig University, Talstrasse 33, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Manuela Ersson-LembeckDepartment of Education and Psychology, Comparative Developmental Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Manfred HolodynskiFaculty of Psychology, Institute of Psychology in Education, University of Münster, Fliednerstrasse 21, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Katja LiebalFaculty of Life Sciences, Institute of Biology, Human Biology and Primate Cognition, Leipzig University, Talstrasse 33, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2447-8327
Leipzig University of Applied Sciences · DEInstitute of Developmental Physiology · RUUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human mothers interact with their infants in different ways. In Western, educated, industrialized, rich and democratic (WEIRD) societies, face-to-face interactions and mutual gazes are especially frequent, yet little is known about their developmental trajectories and if they differ from those of other primates. Using a cross-species developmental approach, we compared mother-infant interactions in 10 dyads of urban humans from a WEIRD society (

Indexed as

Mother-Child RelationsMothersPan troglodytesAnimalsBiological EvolutionCognitionFemaleHumansInfantSocial Groupchimpanzeesface-to-face interactionshumansmother–infant dyads

Identifiers

PMID36871581
PMCPMC9985962
OpenAlexW4323257211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.