Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36871576›Full record

ArticleExperimental aging research

Interoception, Affect, and Cognition in Older Adults.

Marcus Haustein, Emily B K Thomas, Kodi Scheer, Natalie L Denburg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental aging research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcus HausteinDepartment of Neurology, Division of Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa, USA.
Emily B K ThomasDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Iowa, USA.
Kodi ScheerDepartment of Neurology, Division of Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa, USA.
Natalie L DenburgDepartment of Neurology, Division of Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa, USA.
University of Iowa · US

Funding

SHORT-TERM TRAINING: STUDENTS IN HEALTH PROF. SCHOOLST35HL007485 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ROGHAIR, ROBERT D · 1985 to 2019
$4.3M
Stress and Decision-Making in Older Persons: Toward a Neurobehavioral PhenotypeR56AG046539 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI DENBURG, NATALIE L · 2015 to 2015
$383k
NHLBI NIH HHS T35 HL007485NIA NIH HHS R56 AG046539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interoception is the detection of signals that arise from within the body. Interoceptive sensitivity has been found to be associated with affect and cognition among younger adults, and examination of these relationships in older adult samples is beginning to emerge. Here, we take an exploratory approach to determine how demographic, affective, and cognitive variables relate to interoceptive sensitivity in neurologically normal older adults, aged 60-91 years old. Ninety-one participants completed a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, self-report questionnaires, and a heartbeat counting task to measure interoceptive sensitivity. Our findings revealed several relationships: 1) interoceptive sensitivity was inversely correlated with measures of positive emotionality: participants with higher interoceptive sensitivity tended to have lower levels of positive affect and trait extraversion; 2) interoceptive sensitivity was found to positively correlate with cognition: participants who performed better on the heartbeat-counting task also tended to perform better on a measure of delayed verbal memory; and 3) when examining the predictors of interoceptive sensitivity in a single hierarchical regression model, higher interoceptive sensitivity was related to: higher time estimation, lower positive affect, lower extraversion, and higher verbal memory. In total, the model accounted for 38% of the variability in interoceptive sensitivity (

Indexed as

InteroceptionAgedAged, 80 and overAgingCognitionEmotionsHeart RateHumans

Identifiers

PMID36871576
PMCPMC10477322
OpenAlexW4323256634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.