Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36871503›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2023

The Hertel classification can't predict the risk of humeral head osteonecrosis after osteosynthesis using an anterolateral approach.

Márcio Alves Cruz, Guilherme Grisi Mouraria, Fernando Kenji Kikuta, Daniel Romano Zogbi, Sérgio de Paula Coelho, Maurício Etchebehere

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Does the Hertel criteria correlate with postoperative avascular necrosis and failure in proximal humerus fractures? A retrospective cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Márcio Alves CruzOrthopedics and Traumatology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Guilherme Grisi MourariaOrthopedics and Traumatology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: mouraria@unicamp.br.
Fernando Kenji KikutaOrthopedics and Traumatology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Daniel Romano ZogbiOrthopedics and Traumatology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Sérgio de Paula CoelhoOrthopedics and Traumatology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Maurício EtchebehereOrthopedics and Traumatology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProximal humeral fractures can progress to osteonecrosis of the humeral head. Hertel developed a binary classification system (12 subtypes) and demonstrated that some patterns have more risk to develop osteonecrosis. Hertel described the prevalence and the risk factors for Humeral head osteonecrosis after osteosynthesis using a Deltopectoral approach. Few studies have evaluated the prevalence and the capacity of Hertel's classification to predict Humeral Head osteonecrosis following osteosynthesis of proximal Humeral fractures through the anterolateral approach. The objectives of this study were to correlate osteonecrosis predictors established by the Hertel classification with the risk of developing osteonecrosis and its prevalence after osteosynthesis using the anterolateral approach.

methodsThis was a retrospective study of patients who underwent osteosynthesis of proximal humerus fractures using an anterolateral approach. Patients were divided into two groups: high risk for necrosis (group 1) and low risk for necrosis (group 2) according to Hertel's criteria. The overall prevalence of osteonecrosis and the prevalence in each group were calculated. A radiological examination was performed in the true anteroposterior (Grashey), scapular, and axillary views, before and after the operation (minimum 1 year after surgery). A Kaplan-Meier curve was used to assess the pattern of the temporal evolution of osteonecrosis. The groups were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. The unpaired t-test (parametric variables - age) and the Mann-Whitney test (non-parametric time between trauma and surgery) were used.

resultsIn total, 39 patients were evaluated. The postoperative follow-up time was 14.5 ± 3.3 months. The time to onset of necrosis was 14.1 ± 3.9 months. Sex, age, and time between trauma and surgery did not influence the risk of necrosis. Type 2, 9, 10, 11, and 12, or fractures with posteromedial head extension less than or equal to 8 mm, or diaphysis deviation greater than 2 mm, as well as grouping did not influence the risk for osteonecrosis.

conclusionsHertel's criteria were not able to predict the development of osteonecrosis after osteosynthesis of proximal humerus fractures performed through the anterolateral approach. The total prevalence of osteonecrosis was 17.9% with a tendency toward an increased incidence after 1 year of surgical treatment.

Indexed as

Humeral FracturesOsteonecrosisShoulder FracturesHumansHumeral HeadNecrosisRetrospective StudiesOsteonecrosisShoulder fracture

Identifiers

PMID36871503
PMCPMC10009436
OpenAlexW4323065650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read43
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.