Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36871281›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2023

Functional outcomes after transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME): a random forest analysis to predict patients' outcomes.

F Tirelli, L Lorenzon, A Biondi, I Neri, G Santoro, R Persiani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

F TirelliGeneral Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
L LorenzonGeneral Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
A BiondiGeneral Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy. alberto.biondi@policlinicogemelli.it.ORCID 0000-0002-2470-7858
I NeriGeneral Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
G SantoroGeneral Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
R PersianiGeneral Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnorectal, sexual, and urinary dysfunction are common issues after rectal cancer surgery, although seldom explored. The primary aim of this study was to investigate postoperative anorectal functional results.

methodsPatients with mid/low-rectal cancer treated with transanal TME (TaTME) with primary anastomosis with/without diverting stoma between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed and selected if they had a minimum follow-up of 6 months (from the primary procedure or stoma reversal). Patients were interviewed using validated questionnaires and the primary outcome was bowel function based on Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) scores. Statistical analyses were performed to identify clinical/operative variables correlated with worse outcomes. A random forest (RF) algorithm was computed to classify patients at a greater risk of minor/major LARS.

resultsNinety-seven patients were selected out of 154 TaTME performed. Overall, 88.7% of the patients had a protective stoma and 25.8% reported major LARS at mean follow-up of 19.0 months. Statistical analyses documented that age, operative time, and interval to stoma reversal correlated with LARS outcomes. The RF analysis disclosed worse LARS symptoms in patients with longer operative time (> 295 min) and stoma reversal interval (> 5.6 months). If the interval ranged between 3 and 5.6 months, older patients (> 65 years) reported worse outcomes. Finally, no statistical difference was documented when comparing the rate of minor/major LARS in the first 27 cases versus others.

conclusionOne-quarter of the patients developed major LARS after TaTME. An algorithm based on clinical/operative variables, such as age, operative time, and time to stoma reversal, was developed to identify categories at risk for LARS symptoms.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRectal NeoplasmsTransanal Endoscopic SurgeryHumansLow Anterior Resection SyndromePostoperative ComplicationsRandom ForestRectumTreatment OutcomeFunctional outcomesLARS scoreRandom forestTaTMETransanal total mesorectal excision

Identifiers

PMID36871281
PMCPMC9985820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.