ArticleMedical education online2023
Assessing trainee critical thinking skills using a novel interactive online learning tool.
Article in Medical education online, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCritical thinking is essential for the accurate diagnosis and management of patients. It is correlated with academic success.
objectiveOur objective was to design a novel tool for interactive online learning to improve knowledge and to assess trainees' critical thinking skills using the framework of the American Philosophical Association (APA).
methodsResidents, fellows and students participated in an online, self-directed case-based vignette activity to learn malaria diagnosis and management. Pre and post-tests with multiple choice and open-ended case-based questions assessed knowledge and critical thinking. Comparison between pre and post-test scores across subgroups were performed using paired t-tests or one-way ANOVA.
resultsBetween 4 April 2017 to 14 July 2019, 62 of 75 (82%) eligible subjects completed both the pre and the post-test. Improved post-test scores occurred in 90% of medical students, p=0.001, 77% of residents, p<0.001, 60% of fellows, p=0.72 and 75% of trainees overall, p=<0.001. Fellows had higher pre-test scores than students or residents but there was no difference by level of training on the post-test.
conclusionsThis interactive online learning activity effectively imparted medical knowledge and improved trainee responses to questions requiring critical thinking. To our knowledge, this is the first time the APA's critical thinking framework has been incorporated into interactive online learning and assessment of critical thinking skills in medical trainees. We applied this innovation specifically in global health education, but there is obvious potential to expand it to a wide variety of areas of clinical training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.