Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36871233›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2023

Structured versus non-structured reporting of pelvic MRI for ileal pouch evaluation: clarity and effectiveness.

Luke A Ginocchio, Bari Dane, Paul N Smereka, Alec J Megibow, Feza H Remzi, Eren Esen, Chenchan Huang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luke A GinocchioDepartment of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, 10016, USA. luke.ginocchio@nyulangone.org.ORCID 0000-0002-0183-7246
Bari DaneDepartment of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Paul N SmerekaDepartment of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Alec J MegibowDepartment of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Feza H RemziDepartment of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Eren EsenDepartment of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Chenchan HuangDepartment of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
NYU Langone Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGiven that ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery is a technically challenging and high-morbidity procedure, there are numerous pertinent imaging findings that need to be clearly and efficiently communicated to the IBD surgeons for essential patient management and surgical planning. Structured reporting has been increasingly used over the past decade throughout various radiology subspecialties to improve reporting clarity and completeness. We compare structured versus non-structured reporting of pelvic MRI for ileal pouch to evaluate for clarity and effectiveness.

methods164 consecutive pelvic MRI's for ileal pouch evaluation, excluding subsequent exams for the same patient, acquired between 1/1/2019 and 7/31/2021 at one institution were included, before and after implementation (11/15/2020) of a structured reporting template, which was created with institutional IBD surgeons. Reports were assessed for the presence of 18 key features required for complete ileal pouch assessment: anastomosis (IPAA, tip of J, pouch body), cuff (length, cuffitis), pouch body (size, pouchitis, stricture), pouch inlet/pre-pouch ileum (stricture, inflammation, sharp angulation), pouch outlet (stricture), peripouch mesentery (position, mesentery twist), pelvic abscess, peri-anal fistula, pelvic lymph nodes, and skeletal abnormalities. Subgroup analysis was performed based on reader experience and divided into three categories: experienced (n = 2), other intra-institutional (n = 20), or affiliate site (n = 6).

results57 (35%) structured and 107 (65%) non-structured pelvic MRI reports were reviewed. Structured reports contained 16.6 [SD:4.0] key features whereas non-structured reports contained 6.3 [SD:2.5] key features (p < .001). The largest improvement following template implementation was for reporting sharp angulation of the pouch inlet (91.2% vs. 0.9%, p < .001), tip of J suture line and pouch body anastomosis (both improved to 91.2% from 3.7%). Structured versus non-structured reports contained mean 17.7 versus 9.1 key features for experienced readers, 17.0 versus 5.9 for other intra-institutional readers, and 8.7 versus 5.3 for affiliate site readers.

conclusionStructured reporting of pelvic MRI guides a systematic search pattern and comprehensive evaluation of ileal pouches, and therefore facilitates surgical planning and clinical management. This standardized reporting template can serve as baseline at other institutions for adaptation based on specific radiology and surgery preferences, fostering a collaborative environment between radiology and surgery, and ultimately improving patient care.

Indexed as

Colonic PouchesInflammatory Bowel DiseasesProctocolectomy, RestorativeConstriction, PathologicHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPostoperative ComplicationsIleal pouchInflammatory bowel diseasePelvic MRIStandardized reportingStructured reporting

Identifiers

PMID36871233
OpenAlexW4323255477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.