ArticleInternational ophthalmology2023
Optic nerve sheath diameter and axial length in patients with optic disc drusen: a cross-sectional study.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimMeasuring the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) and the anteroposterior axial length of the eye in patients with optic disc drusen (ODD).
methodsA total of 43 healthy volunteers and 41 patients with ODD were included in the study. The ONSD and axial length were measured in the posterior position using an ultrasound device (E-Z Scan AB5500 +) probe with a 10 MHz frequency. The ONSD was measured 3 mm behind the globe wall. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine patients with ODD using ONSD. Any p-value of < 0.05 was accepted to demonstrate significance.
resultsThe ONSD was significantly higher (5.2 mm and 4.8 mm, p = 0.006, respectively), and the axial length was shorter (21.82 ± 2.15 mm and 23.27 ± 1.96 mm, p = 0.002, respectively) in the ODD group. The spherical equivalent was more commonly seen as hypermetropic in the ODD group (1.00 [- 0.85 to 1.75]). In the ROC analysis to determine the ONSD value in ODD diagnosis, the area under the curve was 0.6754 (95% confidence interval 0.559-0.788, p = 0.006). ONSD cutoff of 5.70 mm had a sensitivity of 0.366 and a specificity of 0.907 to diagnose ODD.
conclusionIn this study, the ONSD was significantly higher in the ODD group. The axial length was shorter in the ODD group. This study is the first in the literature to evaluate the ONSD in patients with optic disc drusen. Further studies are needed in this regard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.