Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36871106›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2023

C. elegans is not a robust model organism for the magnetic sense.

Erich Pascal Malkemper, Patrycja Pikulik, Tim Luca Krause, Jun Liu, Li Zhang, Brittany Hamauei, Monika Scholz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Erich Pascal MalkemperMax Planck Research Group Neurobiology of Magnetoreception, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, Bonn, Germany. pascal.malkemper@mpinb.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1099-0119
Patrycja Pikulik *Max Planck Research Group Neurobiology of Magnetoreception, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, Bonn, Germany.
Tim Luca Krause *Max Planck Research Group Neurobiology of Magnetoreception, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, Bonn, Germany.
Jun LiuMax Planck Research Group Neural Information Flow, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, Bonn, Germany.
Li ZhangMax Planck Research Group Neurobiology of Magnetoreception, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1637-2522
Brittany HamaueiMax Planck Research Group Neurobiology of Magnetoreception, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, Bonn, Germany.
Monika ScholzMax Planck Research Group Neural Information Flow, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, Bonn, Germany. monika.scholz@mpinb.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2186-410X
Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology · DECenter of Advanced European Studies and Research · DECzech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetoreception is defined as the ability to sense and use the Earth's magnetic field, for example to orient and direct movements. The receptors and sensory mechanisms underlying behavioral responses to magnetic fields remain unclear. A previous study described magnetoreception in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, which requires the activity of a single pair of sensory neurons. These results suggest C. elegans as a tractable model organism for facilitating the search for magnetoreceptors and signaling pathways. The finding is controversial, however, as an attempt to replicate the experiment in a different laboratory was unsuccessful. We here independently test the magnetic sense of C. elegans, closely replicating the assays developed in the original publication. We find that C. elegans show no directional preference in magnetic fields of both natural and higher intensity, suggesting that magnetotactic behavior in the worm is not robustly evoked in a laboratory setting. Given the lack of a robust magnetic response under controlled conditions, we conclude that C. elegans is not a suitable model organism to study the mechanism of the magnetic sense.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansMagnetic FieldsOrientationAnimals

Identifiers

PMID36871106
PMCPMC9985618
OpenAlexW4323074822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.