Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36871037›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2023

Experimental community coalescence sheds light on microbial interactions in soil and restores impaired functions.

Sarah Huet, Sana Romdhane, Marie-Christine Breuil, David Bru, Arnaud Mounier, Ayme Spor, Laurent Philippot

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Principles for Rigorous Design and Application of Synthetic Microbial Communities.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Role of horizontal gene transfer and cooperation in rhizosphere microbiome assembly.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah HuetUniversity Bourgogne Franche-Comte, INRAE, Institut Agro Dijon, Agroecologie Department, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon, 21000, France.
Sana RomdhaneUniversity Bourgogne Franche-Comte, INRAE, Institut Agro Dijon, Agroecologie Department, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon, 21000, France.
Marie-Christine BreuilUniversity Bourgogne Franche-Comte, INRAE, Institut Agro Dijon, Agroecologie Department, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon, 21000, France.
David BruUniversity Bourgogne Franche-Comte, INRAE, Institut Agro Dijon, Agroecologie Department, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon, 21000, France.
Arnaud MounierUniversity Bourgogne Franche-Comte, INRAE, Institut Agro Dijon, Agroecologie Department, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon, 21000, France.
Ayme SporUniversity Bourgogne Franche-Comte, INRAE, Institut Agro Dijon, Agroecologie Department, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon, 21000, France.
Laurent PhilippotUniversity Bourgogne Franche-Comte, INRAE, Institut Agro Dijon, Agroecologie Department, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon, 21000, France. laurent.philippot@inrae.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrobes typically live in communities where individuals can interact with each other in numerous ways. However, knowledge on the importance of these interactions is limited and derives mainly from studies using a limited number of species grown in coculture. Here, we manipulated soil microbial communities to assess the contribution of interactions between microorganisms for assembly of the soil microbiome.

resultsBy combining experimental removal (taxa depletion in the community) and coalescence (mixing of manipulated and control communities) approaches, we demonstrated that interactions between microorganisms can play a key role in determining their fitness during soil recolonization. The coalescence approach not only revealed the importance of density-dependent interactions in microbial community assembly but also allowed to restore partly or fully community diversity and soil functions. Microbial community manipulation resulted in shifts in both inorganic nitrogen pools and soil pH, which were related to the proportion of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria.

conclusionsOur work provides new insights into the understanding of the importance of microbial interactions in soil. Our top-down approach combining removal and coalescence manipulation also allowed linking community structure and ecosystem functions. Furthermore, these results highlight the potential of manipulating microbial communities for the restoration of soil ecosystems. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

BetaproteobacteriaMicrobiotaCoculture TechniquesHumansMicrobial InteractionsSoilSoilCoalescenceCommunity manipulationDensity-dependent interactionsMicrobial interactionsRestorationSoil functions

Identifiers

PMID36871037
PMCPMC9985222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.