Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36870390›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2023

The evolving use of biomarkers in heart transplantation: Consensus of an expert panel.

Jon Kobashigawa, Shelley Hall, Palak Shah, Barry Fine, Phil Halloran, Annette M Jackson, Kiran K Khush, Kenneth B Margulies, Maryam Mojarrad Sani, Jignesh K Patel and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06740578 (Evaluation of the Added Clinical Value of Donor-derived Cell-free DNA for the Monitoring of Cardiac Allograft Rejection), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06740578 completednot on this map

Evaluation of the Added Clinical Value of Donor-derived Cell-free DNA for the Monitoring of Cardiac Allograft Rejection: an Observational Prospective Longitudinal Multicenter Study.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorParis Translational Research Center for Organ TransplantationRan2021 to 2023Enrolled320ConditionsHeart Transplantation, Rejection Heart Transplant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Surveillance donor-specific antibody and pathologic antibody-mediated rejection testing in heart transplant patients in the contemporary era.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Circulating T cell specific extracellular vesicle profiles in cardiac allograft acute cellular rejection.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Banff Human Organ Transplant Consensus Gene Panel for the Detection of Antibody Mediated Rejection in Heart Allograft Biopsies.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jon KobashigawaDepartment of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA. Electronic address: kobashigawaj@cshs.org.
Shelley HallDepartment of Cardiology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Palak ShahDepartment of Cardiology, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA.
Barry FineDepartment of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA.
Phil HalloranDepartment of Medicine Division of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Annette M JacksonDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Department of Immunology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kiran K KhushDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Kenneth B MarguliesDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Maryam Mojarrad SaniDepartment of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Jignesh K PatelDepartment of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Nikhil PatelDepartment of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Eliot PeysterDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
conference participants

Funding

Computer-Assisted Histologic Evaluation of Cardiac Allograft RejectionR01HL151277 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MADABHUSHI, ANANT, MARGULIES, KENNETH BER · 2020 to 2023
$3.2M
Personalized Rejection Risk Assessment in Cardiac TransplantationK08HL159344 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PEYSTER, ELIOT · 2021 to 2024
$667k
BLRD VA IK6 BX006185NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL159344NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL151277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In heart transplantation, the use of biomarkers to detect the risk of rejection has been evolving. In this setting, it is becoming less clear as to what is the most reliable test or combination of tests to detect rejection and assess the state of the alloimmune response. Therefore, a virtual expert panel was organized in heart and kidney transplantation to evaluate emerging diagnostics and how they may be best utilized to monitor and manage transplant patients. This manuscript covers the heart content of the conference and is a work product of the American Society of Transplantation's Thoracic and Critical Care Community of Practice. This paper reviews currently available and emerging diagnostic assays and defines the unmet needs for biomarkers in heart transplantation. Highlights of the in-depth discussions among conference participants that led to development of consensus statements are included. This conference should serve as a platform to further build consensus within the heart transplant community regarding the optimal framework to implement biomarkers into management protocols and to improve biomarker development, validation and clinical utility. Ultimately, these biomarkers and novel diagnostics should improve outcomes and optimize quality of life for our transplant patients.

Indexed as

Heart TransplantationKidney TransplantationBiomarkersGraft RejectionHumansQuality of LifeBiomarkersbiomarkersdonor-derived cell-free deoxyribonucleic acidgenomicsheart transplantationmachine learningmicroRNAoutcomes

Identifiers

PMID36870390
PMCPMC10387364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.