ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2023
The outcomes of a low-cost, non-valved glaucoma drainage device using mitomycin-C: 1-year results.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison between Ahmed glaucoma valve implant and Keiki Mehta body pressure glaucoma implant in neovascular glaucoma: 24-month results.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Surgical outcomes of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation surgery: With mitomycin C and without mitomycin C.Journal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the indications, outcomes, and complications of the usage of Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant (AADI) using mitomycin-C.
methodsA retrospective case series of patients who underwent AADI placement using mitomycin-C between April 2018 and June 2020 at Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt. The data was extracted from the records of the patients with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. Complete success was defined as IOP ≥ 5 mmHg and ≤ 21 mmHg or reduction of IOP by ≥ 20% from baseline without antiglaucoma medications (AGMs). Qualified success was defined as reaching the same IOP range with the aid of AGM.
resultsA total of 50 eyes of 48 patients were included. Neovascular glaucoma represented the commonest indication (13 patients, 26%). The mean preoperative IOP was 34.0 ± 7.1 mmHg, with a median number of AGM of 3 (mean ± SD = 2.84 ± 1), while the mean IOP after 12 months was 14.3 ± 4 with a median number of AGM of 0. (mean ± SD = 0.52 ± 0.89) (p < 0.001). Complete success was achieved in 33 patients (66%). Qualified success was achieved in 14 patients (28%). Thirteen eyes (26%) had variable postoperative complications; none of them required explantation of the device or affected the visual acuity (except one patient).
conclusionAADI with using mitomycin-C and ripcord during the surgery is an effective and relatively safe method of control of IOP in refractory and advanced cases of glaucoma, with an overall success rate of 94%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.