Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36869788›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of heredity2023

The revised reference genome of the leopard gecko (Eublepharis macularius) provides insight into the considerations of genome phasing and assembly.

Brendan J Pinto, Tony Gamble, Chase H Smith, Shannon E Keating, Justin C Havird, Ylenia Chiari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of heredity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Extraordinary model systems for regeneration.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Article
  12. The dynamic behavior of chromatophores marks the transition from bands to spots in leopard geckos.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The first complete mitochondrial DNA ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brendan J PintoSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4243-5788
Tony GambleDepartment of Zoology, Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0204-8003
Chase H SmithDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1499-0311
Shannon E KeatingDepartment of Biological Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2601-0816
Justin C HavirdDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8692-6503
Ylenia ChiariDepartment of Biology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2338-8602

Funding

Causes and Consequences of Mitochondrial MutationsR35GM142836 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HAVIRD, JUSTIN C · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic resources across squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) have lagged behind other vertebrate systems and high-quality reference genomes remain scarce. Of the 23 chromosome-scale reference genomes across the order, only 12 of the ~60 squamate families are represented. Within geckos (infraorder Gekkota), a species-rich clade of lizards, chromosome-level genomes are exceptionally sparse representing only two of the seven extant families. Using the latest advances in genome sequencing and assembly methods, we generated one of the highest-quality squamate genomes to date for the leopard gecko, Eublepharis macularius (Eublepharidae). We compared this assembly to the previous, short-read only, E. macularius reference genome published in 2016 and examined potential factors within the assembly influencing contiguity of genome assemblies using PacBio HiFi data. Briefly, the read N50 of the PacBio HiFi reads generated for this study was equal to the contig N50 of the previous E. macularius reference genome at 20.4 kilobases. The HiFi reads were assembled into a total of 132 contigs, which was further scaffolded using HiC data into 75 total sequences representing all 19 chromosomes. We identified 9 of the 19 chromosomal scaffolds were assembled as a near-single contig, whereas the other 10 chromosomes were each scaffolded together from multiple contigs. We qualitatively identified that the percent repeat content within a chromosome broadly affects its assembly contiguity prior to scaffolding. This genome assembly signifies a new age for squamate genomics where high-quality reference genomes rivaling some of the best vertebrate genome assemblies can be generated for a fraction of previous cost estimates. This new E. macularius reference assembly is available on NCBI at JAOPLA010000000.

Indexed as

GenomeLizardsAnimalsChromosome MappingChromosomesGenomicsHumansemerging model systemevolutiongekkotagenomicsphasing

Identifiers

PMID36869788
PMCPMC10445513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.