Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36869756›Full record

ArticleAnnals of work exposures and health2023

Workplace Exposure Measurements of Emission from Industrial 3D Printing.

Anneli Kangas, Kirsi Kukko, Tomi Kanerva, Arto Säämänen, Jan Sher Akmal, Jouni Partanen, Anna-Kaisa Viitanen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of work exposures and health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anneli KangasFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, P.O. Box 40, FI-00032 Työterveyslaitos, Finland.
Kirsi KukkoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland.
Tomi KanervaFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, P.O. Box 40, FI-00032 Työterveyslaitos, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2245-1921
Arto SäämänenFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, P.O. Box 40, FI-00032 Työterveyslaitos, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5455-6288
Jan Sher AkmalDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland.
Jouni PartanenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland.
Anna-Kaisa ViitanenFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, P.O. Box 40, FI-00032 Työterveyslaitos, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1677-6917
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health · FIAalto University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Particle and gaseous contaminants from industrial scale additive manufacturing (AM) machines were studied in three different work environments. Workplaces utilized powder bed fusion, material extrusion, and binder jetting techniques with metal and polymer powders, polymer filaments, and gypsum powder, respectively. The AM processes were studied from operator's point of view to identify exposure events and possible safety risks. Total number of particle concentrations were measured in the range of 10 nm to 300 nm from operator's breathing zone using portable devices and in the range of 2.5 nm to 10 µm from close vicinity of the AM machines using stationary measurement devices. Gas-phase compounds were measured with photoionization, electrochemical sensors, and an active air sampling method which were eventually followed by laboratory analyses. The duration of the measurements varied from 3 to 5 days during which the manufacturing processes were practically continuous. We identified several work phases in which an operator can potentially be exposed by inhalation (pulmonary exposure) to airborne emissions. A skin exposure was also identified as a potential risk factor based on the observations made on work tasks related to the AM process. The results confirmed that nanosized particles were present in the breathing air of the workspace when the ventilation of the AM machine was inadequate. Metal powders were not measured from the workstation air thanks to the closed system and suitable risk control procedures. Still, handling of metal powders and AM materials that can act as skin irritants such as epoxy resins were found to pose a potential risk for workers. This emphasizes the importance of appropriate control measures for ventilation and material handling that should be addressed in AM operations and environment.

Indexed as

Air Pollutants, OccupationalOccupational ExposureHumansParticle SizePolymersPowdersPrinting, Three-DimensionalWorkplaceAir Pollutants, OccupationalPolymersPowdersadditive manufacturinggas-phase compoundsindustrial printersnanoparticlesoccupational health

Identifiers

PMID36869756
PMCPMC10243937
OpenAlexW4323066503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.