Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36869685›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2023

A model template approach for rapid evaluation and application of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models: extension to volatile organic compounds.

Amanda S Bernstein, Bidya Prasad, Paul M Schlosser, Dustin F Kapraun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amanda S BernsteinOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3732-1433
Bidya PrasadCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, North Carolina 27711, USA.
Paul M SchlosserCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, North Carolina 27711, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9699-9108
Dustin F KapraunCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, North Carolina 27711, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5570-6383

Funding

Center for Public Health and Environmental AssessmentEPAIntramural EPA EPA999999Oak Ridge Institute for Science and EducationU.S. Department of Energy
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical risk assessors use physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models to perform dosimetric calculations, including extrapolations between exposure scenarios, species, and populations of interest. Assessors should complete a thorough quality assurance (QA) review to ensure biological accuracy and correct implementation prior to using these models. This process can be time-consuming, and we developed a PBPK model template that allows for faster, more efficient QA review. The model template consists of a single model "superstructure" with equations and logic commonly found in PBPK models, allowing users to implement a wide variety of chemical-specific PBPK models. QA review can be completed more quickly than for conventional PBPK model implementations because the general model equations have already been reviewed and only parameters describing chemical-specific model and exposure scenarios need review for any given model implementation. We have expanded a previous version of the PBPK model template by adding features commonly included in PBPK models for volatile organic compounds (VOCs). We included multiple options for representing concentrations in blood, describing metabolism, and modeling gas exchange processes to allow for inhalation exposures. We created PBPK model template implementations of published models for seven VOCs: dichloromethane, methanol, chloroform, styrene, vinyl chloride, trichloroethylene, and carbon tetrachloride. Simulations performed using our template implementations matched published simulation results to a high degree of accuracy (maximum observed percent error: 1%). Thus, the model template approach can now be applied to a broader class of chemical-specific PBPK models while continuing to bolster efficiency of QA processes that should be conducted prior to using models for risk assessment applications.

Indexed as

PBPK modelpharmacokineticsrisk assessmenttemplate modelVOCs

Identifiers

PMID36869685
PMCPMC11998980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.