Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36869381›Full record

SynthesisReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2023

The effects of first-line pharmacological treatments for reproductive outcomes in infertile women with PCOS: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Ge Peng, Zhe Yan, Yuqi Liu, Juan Li, Jinfang Ma, Nanwei Tong, Yan Wang

Open access · goldFull text readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. PCOS and vitamin D: a clinical appraisal.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ge Peng *Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Zhe Yan *Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Yuqi LiuDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Juan LiDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Jinfang MaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Nanwei TongDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China. tongnw@scu.edu.cn.
Yan WangDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, West China 2nd University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China. wangyy1210@163.com.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

1.3.5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University No. ZYGD18017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common causes of infertility in reproductive-age women. However, the efficacy and optimal therapeutic strategy for reproductive outcomes are still under debate. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of different first-line pharmacological therapies in terms of reproductive outcomes for women with PCOS and infertility.

methodsA systematic retrieval of databases was conducted, and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of pharmacological interventions for infertile PCOS women were included. The primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy and live birth, and the secondary outcomes were miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and multiple pregnancy. A network meta-analysis based on a Bayesian model was performed to compare the effects of the pharmacological strategies.

resultsA total of 27 RCTs with 12 interventions were included, and all therapies tended to increase clinical pregnancy, especially pioglitazone (PIO) (log OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.56 ~ 4.70, moderate confidence), clomiphene citrate (CC) + exenatide (EXE) (2.96, 1.07 ~ 4.82, moderate confidence) and CC + metformin (MET) + PIO (2.82, 0.99 ~ 4.60, moderate confidence). Moreover, CC + MET + PIO (2.8, -0.25 ~ 6.06, very low confidence) could increase live birth most when compared to placebo, even without a significant difference. For secondary outcomes, PIO showed a tendency to increase miscarriage (1.44, -1.69 ~ 5.28, very low confidence). MET (-11.25, -33.7 ~ 0.57, low confidence) and LZ + MET (-10.44, -59.56 ~ 42.11, very low confidence) were beneficial for decreasing ectopic pregnancy. MET (0.07, -4.26 ~ 4.34, low confidence) showed a neutral effect in multiple pregnancy. Subgroup analysis demonstrated no significant difference between these medications and placebo in obese participants.

conclusionsMost first-line pharmacological treatments were effective in improving clinical pregnancy. CC + MET + PIO should be recommended as the optimal therapeutic strategy to improve pregnancy outcomes. However, none of the above treatments had a beneficial effect on clinical pregnancy in obese PCOS.

trial registrationCRD42020183541; 05 July 2020.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousInfertility, FemaleMetforminPolycystic Ovary SyndromeClomipheneFemaleHumansLive BirthObesityPioglitazonePregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicClomipheneMetforminPioglitazoneInfertilityNetwork meta-analysisPharmacological treatmentPolycystic ovarian syndrome

Identifiers

PMID36869381
PMCPMC9983155
OpenAlexW4323042581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.