Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36869250›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2023

Validation and optimization of the diatom L/D ratio as a diagnostic marker for drowning.

Dominik Hagen, Stefan Pittner, Jian Zhao, Astrid Obermayer, Walter Stoiber, Peter Steinbacher, Fabio C Monticelli, Walther Gotsmy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dominik HagenDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Stefan PittnerDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Forensic Psychiatry, Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Jian ZhaoGuangzhou Forensic Science Institute & Key Laboratory of Forensic Pathology, Ministry of Public Security, Guangzhou, China.
Astrid ObermayerDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Walter StoiberDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Peter SteinbacherDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Fabio C MonticelliDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Forensic Psychiatry, Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Walther GotsmyDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Forensic Psychiatry, Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria. walther.gotsmy@plus.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

If a dead body is discovered in water, it nearly always raises the question about the cause of death, often associated with the persistent problem to differentiate between a drowning incident and post-mortem immersion. In numerous cases, a reliable confirmation of death by drowning is often only possible by a combination of diagnoses obtained from autopsy and additional investigations. As to the latter, the use of diatoms has been suggested (and debated) since decades. Based on the consideration that diatoms are present in almost every natural waterbody and are unavoidably incorporated when water is inhaled, their presence in the lung and other tissues can provide evidence of drowning. However, the traditional diatom test methods are still subject of controversial discussion and suspected of erroneous outcome, predominantly through contamination. A promising alternative to minimize the risk of erroneous outcome seems to be disclosed by the recently suggested MD-VF-Auto SEM technique. Especially the establishment of a new diagnostic marker (L/D ratio), which represents the factorial proportion between the diatom concentration in lung tissue and the drowning medium, allows for clearer distinction of drowning and post-mortal immersion and is largely robust to contamination. However, this highly elaborated technique requires specific devices which are frequently unavailable. We therefore developed a modified method of SEM-based diatom testing to enable the use on more routinely available equipment. Process steps such as digestion, filtration, and image acquisition were thoroughly broken down, optimized, and ultimately validated in five confirmed drowning cases. Taking certain limitations into consideration, L/D ratio analysis provided promising results, even in cases of advanced decomposition. We conclude that our modified protocol indeed opens a way for a broader use of the method in forensic drowning investigation.

Indexed as

DiatomsDrowningForensic PathologyHumansLungWaterWaterDiatomsDrowningL/D valueSEM

Identifiers

PMID36869250
PMCPMC10085902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.