Observational studyScientific reports2023
Significance of pulse pressure variability in predicting functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Intraprocedural Pulse Pressure During Mechanical Thrombectomy on Functional and Radiological Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Intensive vs. standard nurse-supervised blood pressure monitoring and intensive care utilization in acute hypertensive encephalopathy: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Short-term pulse pressure variability: a novel prognostic marker and therapeutic target in patients with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome? Preliminary results from a pilot study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Article
- Higher Long-Term Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability Is Associated With Severe Cerebral Small Vessel Disease in the General Population.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Article
- The impact of blood pressure variability on the development of parenchymal hematoma in acute cerebral infarction with atrial fibrillation.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the association between pulse pressure variability (PPV) and short- and long-term outcomes of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. We studied 203 tertiary stroke center patients with AIS. PPV during 72 h after admission was analyzed using different variability parameters including standard deviation (SD). Patients' outcome was assessed after 30 and 90 days post-stroke with modified Rankin Scale. The association between PPV and outcome was investigated using logistic regression analysis with adjustment for potential confounders. The predictive significance of PPV parameters was determined using area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics. In the unadjusted logistic regression analysis, all PPV indicators were independently associated with unfavorable outcome at 30 days (i.a. Odds ratio (OR) = 4.817, 95%CI 2.283-10.162 per 10 mmHg increase in SD, p = 0.000) and 90 days (i.a. OR = 4.248, 95%CI 2.044-8.831 per 10 mmHg increase in SD, p = 0.000). After adjustment for confounders, ORs for all PPV indicators remained statistically significant. On the basis of AUC values, all PPV parameters were found relevant outcome predictors (p < 0.01). In conclusion, elevated PPV during first 72 h after admission due to AIS is associated with unfavorable outcome at 30 and 90 days, independent of mean blood pressure levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.