ArticleScientific reports2023
Drug-target interaction prediction based on protein features, using wrapper feature selection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sequence-based prediction of drug-target binding using machine learning, deep learning and ensemble models without 3D structural information.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An intelligent drug supply chain management and recommendation framework using blockchain and TRPO-driven multi-agent learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AI-driven drug-target interaction prediction: current progress, challenges, and future roadmap for precision medicine.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Review
- Learning physical interactions to compose biological large language models.Communications chemistry · 2026Review
- LNMGAT: a laplacian regularized pseudo-negative mining graph attention network for robust drug-target interaction prediction under multi-scenario cold-start settings.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- [A heterogeneous graph method integrating multi-layer semantics and topological information for improving drug-target interaction prediction].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2025Article
- ElixirSeeker: A Machine Learning Framework Utilizing Fusion Molecular Fingerprints for the Discovery of Lifespan-Extending Compounds.Aging cell · 2025Article
- QKDTI A quantum kernel based machine learning model for drug target interaction prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A review of machine learning methods for imbalanced data challenges in chemistry.Chemical science · 2025Review
- DruGagent: Multi-Agent Large Language Model-Based Reasoning for Drug-Target Interaction Prediction.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Unlocking biological complexity: the role of machine learning in integrative multi-omics.Academia biology · 2024Article
- Review
- Gut microbiota landscape and potential biomarker identification in female patients with systemic lupus erythematosus using machine learning.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug-target interaction prediction is a vital stage in drug development, involving lots of methods. Experimental methods that identify these relationships on the basis of clinical remedies are time-taking, costly, laborious, and complex introducing a lot of challenges. One group of new methods is called computational methods. The development of new computational methods which are more accurate can be preferable to experimental methods, in terms of total cost and time. In this paper, a new computational model to predict drug-target interaction (DTI), consisting of three phases, including feature extraction, feature selection, and classification is proposed. In feature extraction phase, different features such as EAAC, PSSM and etc. would be extracted from sequence of proteins and fingerprint features from drugs. These extracted features would then be combined. In the next step, one of the wrapper feature selection methods named IWSSR, due to the large amount of extracted data, is applied. The selected features are then given to rotation forest classification, to have a more efficient prediction. Actually, the innovation of our work is that we extract different features; and then select features by the use of IWSSR. The accuracy of the rotation forest classifier based on tenfold on the golden standard datasets (enzyme, ion channels, G-protein-coupled receptors, nuclear receptors) is as follows: 98.12, 98.07, 96.82, and 95.64. The results of experiments indicate that the proposed model has an acceptable rate in DTI prediction and is compatible with the proposed methods in other papers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.