ArticleTransplantation proceedings2023
Optimizing Referral Timing of Patients With Fontan Circulatory Failure for Heart Transplant.
Article in Transplantation proceedings, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contemporary Management and Future Directions of Adults Living With a Fontan Circulation.JACC. Advances · 2026Review
- The fate of the Fontan circulation.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Age-specific determinants of reduced exercise capacity in youth after heart transplant: A longitudinal cohort study.JHLT open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere are no criteria guiding the timing of heart transplant referral for Fontan patients, nor are there any characteristics of those deferred or declined listing reported. This study examines comprehensive transplant evaluations for Fontan patients of all ages, listing decisions, and outcomes to inform referral practices.
methodsRetrospective review of 63 Fontan patients formally assessed by the advanced heart failure service and presented at Mayo Clinic transplant selection committee meetings (TSM) January 2006 to April 2021. The study is compliant with the Helsinki Congress and Declaration of Istanbul and included no prisoners. Statistical analysis was performed with Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Fisher's Exact tests.
resultsMedian age at TSM was 26 years (17.5, 36.5). Most were approved (38/63 [60%]); 9 of 63 (14%) were deferred and 16 of 63 (25%) were declined. Approved patients more commonly were <18 years old at TSM (15/38 [40%] vs 1/25 [4%], P = .002) compared with those deferred/declined. Complications of Fontan circulatory failure were less common in approved vs deferred/declined patients: ascites (15/38 [40%] vs 17/25 [68%], P = .039), cirrhosis (16/38 [42%] vs 19/25 [76%], P = .01), and renal insufficiency (6/38 [16%] vs 11/25 [44%], P = .02). Ejection fraction and atrioventricular valve regurgitation did not differ between groups. Pulmonary artery wedge pressure was overall high normal (12 mm Hg [9,16]) but higher in deferred/declined vs approved patients, 14.5 (11, 19) vs 10 (8, 13.5) mm Hg, P = .015. Overall survival was significantly lower in deferred/declined patients (P = .0018).
conclusionFontan patient referral for heart transplant at younger age and before the onset of end-organ complications is associated with increased approval for transplant listing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.