Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36868789›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2023

Development of a patient-centred electronic review template to support self-management in primary care: a mixed-methods study.

Kirstie McClatchey, Aimee Sheldon, Liz Steed, Jessica Sheringham, Francis Appiagyei, David Price, Vicky Hammersley, Stephanie Taylor, Hilary Pinnock

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. IMPImplementation science communications · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kirstie McClatcheyAsthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Scotland, Edinburgh, UK kirstie.mcclatchey@ed.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1270-7738
Aimee SheldonAsthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Liz SteedInstitute for Population Health Sciences, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University, London, UK.
Jessica SheringhamDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3468-129X
Francis AppiagyeiOptimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK.
David PriceObservational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Vicky HammersleyAsthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Stephanie TaylorInstitute for Population Health Sciences, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University, London, UK.
Hilary PinnockAsthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic templates are frequently used in long-term condition (LTC) reviews (for example, asthma) to act as reminders and improve documentation; however, they can restrict patient-centred care and opportunities for patients to discuss concerns and self-management.

aimThe IMPlementing IMProved Asthma self-management as RouTine (IMP DESIGN &

settingThis was a mixed-methods study, which integrated qualitative and systematic review data, primary care Professional Advisory Group feedback, and qualitative data from clinician interviews.

methodAligned with the Medical Research Council complex intervention framework, a template was developed in the following three phases: (1) development phase, which consisted of a qualitative exploration with clinicians and patients, a systematic review, and prototype template development; (2) feasibility pilot phase, which involved feedback from clinicians (

resultsTemplate development was guided by the preliminary qualitative work and the systematic review. A prototype template was developed with an opening question to establish patient agendas, and a closing prompt to confirm agendas have been addressed and an asthma action plan provided. The feasibility pilot identified refinements needed, including focusing the opening question on asthma. Pre-piloting ensured integration with the IMP

conclusionFollowing the multi-stage development process, the implementation strategy, including the asthma review template, is now being tested in a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Indexed as

asthmageneral practiceprimary health careself-management

Identifiers

PMID36868789
PMCPMC10354399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.