ReviewArtificial intelligence in medicine2023
Benchmarking of Machine Learning classifiers on plasma proteomic for COVID-19 severity prediction through interpretable artificial intelligence.
Review in Artificial intelligence in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Food Production Index Forecasting for Sustainable Food Systems in Türkiye: A Machine Learning-Based Approach.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Structure-Aware Compound-Protein Affinity Prediction via Graph Neural Networks with Group Lasso Regularization.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Applications and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence in ProteomicsCurrent protein & peptide science · 2026Review
- Constructing a predictive model for acute mastitis in lactating women based on machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Utilizing machine learning models for predicting outcomes in acute pancreatitis: development and validation in three retrospective cohorts.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- APNet, an explainable sparse deep learning model to discover differentially active drivers of severe COVID-19.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- The severity assessment and nucleic acid turning-negative-time prediction in COVID-19 patients with COPD using a fused deep learning model.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- Predicting Outcomes of Preterm Neonates Post Intraventricular Hemorrhage.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Predicting bacterial transcription factor binding sites through machine learning and structural characterization based on DNA duplex stability.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Plasma Proteins Associated with COVID-19 Severity in Puerto Rico.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Risk Factors and Prediction of 28-Day-All Cause Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients with Acute Pancreatitis Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Retrospective Analysis of Multi-Institutions.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Development of a novel machine learning model based on laboratory and imaging indices to predict acute cardiac injury in cancer patients with COVID-19 infection: a retrospective observational study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Observational
- The application of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in electronic health record research: A scoping review.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic highlighted the need for software tools that could facilitate patient triage regarding potential disease severity or even death. In this article, an ensemble of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms is evaluated in terms of predicting the severity of their condition using plasma proteomics and clinical data as input. An overview of AI-based technical developments to support COVID-19 patient management is presented outlining the landscape of relevant technical developments. Based on this review, the use of an ensemble of ML algorithms that analyze clinical and biological data (i.e., plasma proteomics) of COVID-19 patients is designed and deployed to evaluate the potential use of AI for early COVID-19 patient triage. The proposed pipeline is evaluated using three publicly available datasets for training and testing. Three ML "tasks" are defined, and several algorithms are tested through a hyperparameter tuning method to identify the highest-performance models. As overfitting is one of the typical pitfalls for such approaches (mainly due to the size of the training/validation datasets), a variety of evaluation metrics are used to mitigate this risk. In the evaluation procedure, recall scores ranged from 0.6 to 0.74 and F1-score from 0.62 to 0.75. The best performance is observed via Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) algorithms. Additionally, input data (proteomics and clinical data) were ranked based on corresponding Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) values and evaluated for their prognosticated capacity and immuno-biological credence. This "interpretable" approach revealed that our ML models could discern critical COVID-19 cases predominantly based on patient's age and plasma proteins on B cell dysfunction, hyper-activation of inflammatory pathways like Toll-like receptors, and hypo-activation of developmental and immune pathways like SCF/c-Kit signaling. Finally, the herein computational workflow is corroborated in an independent dataset and MLP superiority along with the implication of the abovementioned predictive biological pathways are corroborated. Regarding limitations of the presented ML pipeline, the datasets used in this study contain less than 1000 observations and a significant number of input features hence constituting a high-dimensional low-sample (HDLS) dataset which could be sensitive to overfitting. An advantage of the proposed pipeline is that it combines biological data (plasma proteomics) with clinical-phenotypic data. Thus, in principle, the presented approach could enable patient triage in a timely fashion if used on already trained models. However, larger datasets and further systematic validation are needed to confirm the potential clinical value of this approach. The code is available on Github: https://github.com/inab-certh/Predicting-COVID-19-severity-through-interpretable-AI-analysis-of-plasma-proteomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.