Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36868601›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

What do we know about the psychosocial issues associated with cancer during pregnancy? A scoping review and gap analysis.

Jenny Harris, Emma Ream, Jo Armes, Faith Gibson, Afrodita Marcu, Catherine Treena Parsons, Ann Robinson, Sherin Varghese, Karen Poole

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: a qualitative study of women's psychosocial experiences during treatment and survivorship.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jenny HarrisSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK jen.harris@surrey.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8933-117X
Emma ReamSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5436-8036
Jo ArmesSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7994-0796
Faith GibsonSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8125-4584
Afrodita MarcuSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5918-3417
Catherine Treena ParsonsSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3367-9908
Ann RobinsonSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Sherin VargheseChurchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Karen PooleClinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6172-5297
University of Surrey · GBChurchill Hospital · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere is a global increase in the number of women diagnosed with cancer during their pregnancy and a nascent evidence base to guide their supportive care. The purposes of this study were to (1) map research on the psychosocial issues affecting women and their partners on diagnosis and treatment for cancer during pregnancy; (2) determine available supportive care or educational interventions; and (3) identify knowledge gaps for future research and development.

designScoping review. SEARCH STRATEGY: Six databases were searched (Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Medline, Intermid, Maternal and Infant Health) to retrieve primary research (January 1995 to November 2021) investigating women and/or their partner's decision-making and their psychosocial outcomes during and after pregnancy. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Sociodemographic, gestational and disease characteristics of participants and psychosocial issues identified were extracted. Leventhal's self-regulatory model of illness provided a framework for mapping study findings enabling evidence synthesis and gap analysis.

resultsTwelve studies were included, conducted in eight countries in six continents. Most women (70% of 217) were diagnosed with breast cancer during pregnancy. Reporting of sociodemographic, psychiatric, obstetric and oncological characteristics that are important in assessing psychosocial outcomes was inconsistent. None of the studies had a longitudinal design and no supportive care or educational interventions were identified. The gap analysis highlighted the lack of evidence about pathways to diagnosis, impact of late effects and how internal/social resources may affect outcomes.

conclusionsResearch has focused on women with gestational breast cancer. Little is known about those diagnosed with other cancers. We encourage future study designs to capture data on sociodemographic, obstetric, oncological and psychiatric characteristics and adopt a longitudinal approach to explore the longer term psychosocial impact on women and their families. Future research should include outcomes that are meaningful for women (and their partners) and draw on international collaboration to accelerate progress in this field.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualDisease ProgressionFamilyFemaleHumansInfantMedical OncologyPregnancyMENTAL HEALTHOBSTETRICSONCOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID36868601
PMCPMC9990617
OpenAlexW4323066921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.