Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36868592›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Key lessons learnt from COVID-19 intra-action reviews in the Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Kosovo and North Macedonia 2020-2021: a qualitative study.

Jussi Sane, Tanja Schmidt, Nicolas Isla, Rawi Ibrahim, Golubinka Boshevska, Landry Ndriko Mayigane, Delphine Perriat, Janina Stauke, Sarah Esquevin, Angela Fehr and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Jussi SaneWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark sanej@who.int.ORCID 0000-0001-6590-9520
Tanja SchmidtWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nicolas IslaWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rawi IbrahimWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Balkan Hub, Belgrade, Serbia.
Golubinka BoshevskaWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Balkan Hub, Belgrade, Serbia.
Landry Ndriko MayiganeWorld Health Organization, Headquarters, Geneve, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0043-8040
Delphine PerriatRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Janina StaukeRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Sarah EsquevinRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Angela FehrRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Mina BrajovicMontenegro Country Office, Podgorica, Montenegro.
Borko BajićInstitute for Public Health, Podgorica, Montenegro.
Igor GalicInstitute for Public Health, Podgorica, Montenegro.
Isme HumolliWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Pristina Office, Pristina, Kosovo.
Dafina Gexha BunjakuMinistry of Health, Kosovo (in accordance with UNSCR 1244 (1999))*, Pristina, Kosovo.
Stela GheorghitaWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Republic of Moldova Country Office, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.
Arta KuliWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, North Macedonia Country Offic, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Suzana ManevskaMinistry of Health, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Kristina StavridisInstitute of Public Health, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Daniela DemiscanMinistry of Health, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.
Dumitru CapmariNational Agency for Public Health, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.
Abebayehu Assefa MengistuWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Balkan Hub, Belgrade, Serbia.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOur study described how the WHO intra-action review (IAR) methodology was operationalised and customised in three Western Balkan countries and territories and the Republic of Moldova and analysed the common key findings to inform analyses of the lessons learnt from the pandemic response.

designWe extracted data from the respective IAR reports and performed a qualitative thematic content analysis to identify common (between countries and territories) and cross-cutting (across the response pillars) themes on best practices, challenges and priority actions. The analysis involved three stages, namely: extraction of data, initial identification of emerging themes and review and definition of the themes.

settingIARs were conducted in the Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Kosovo and the Republic of North Macedonia between December 2020 and November 2021. The IARs were conducted at different time points relative to the respective pandemic trajectories (14-day incidence rate ranging from 23 to 495 per 100 000).

resultsCase management was reviewed in all the IARs, while the infection prevention and control, surveillance and country-level coordination pillars were reviewed in three countries. The thematic content analysis identified four common and cross-cutting best practices, seven challenges and six priority recommendations. Recommendations included investing in sustainable human resources and technical capacities developed during the pandemic, providing continuous capacity-building and training (with regular simulation exercises), updating legislation, improving communication between healthcare providers at all levels of healthcare and enhancing digitalisation of health information systems.

conclusionsThe IARs provided an opportunity for continuous collective reflection and learning with multisectoral engagement. They also offered an opportunity to review public health emergency preparedness and response functions in general, thereby contributing to generic health systems strengthening and resilience beyond COVID-19. However, success in strengthening the response and preparedness requires leadership and resource allocation, prioritisation and commitment by the countries and territories themselves.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansKosovoMoldovaMontenegroRepublic of North MacedoniaCOVID-19Intra-action reviewpandemicpreparednessresponse

Identifiers

PMID36868592
PMCPMC9990164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.