Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36868521›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2023

Proton Beam Therapy for Early Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

Francesca Holt, Jake Probert, Sarah C Darby, Joanne S Haviland, Charlotte E Coles, Anna M Kirby, Zulian Liu, David Dodwell, Georgios Ntentas, Frances Duane and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca HoltNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: francesca.holt@ndph.ox.ac.uk.
Jake ProbertNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sarah C DarbyNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Joanne S HavilandCentre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Charlotte E ColesDepartment of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Anna M KirbyRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Zulian LiuNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
David DodwellNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Georgios NtentasNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Medical Physics, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Frances DuaneSt. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network and Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland.
Carolyn TaylorNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 28284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdjuvant proton beam therapy (PBT) is increasingly available to patients with breast cancer. It achieves better planned dose distributions than standard photon radiation therapy and therefore may reduce the risks. However, clinical evidence is lacking. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A systematic review of clinical outcomes from studies of adjuvant PBT for early breast cancer published in 2000 to 2022 was undertaken. Early breast cancer was defined as when all detected invasive cancer cells are in the breast or nearby lymph nodes and can be removed surgically. Adverse outcomes were summarized quantitatively, and the prevalence of the most common ones were estimated using meta-analysis.

resultsThirty-two studies (1452 patients) reported clinical outcomes after adjuvant PBT for early breast cancer. Median follow-up ranged from 2 to 59 months. There were no published randomized trials comparing PBT with photon radiation therapy. Scattering PBT was delivered in 7 studies (258 patients) starting 2003 to 2015 and scanning PBT in 22 studies (1041 patients) starting 2000 to 2019. Two studies (123 patients) starting 2011 used both PBT types. For 1 study (30 patients), PBT type was unspecified. Adverse events were less severe after scanning than after scattering PBT. They also varied by clinical target. For partial breast PBT, 498 adverse events were reported (8 studies, 358 patients). None were categorized as severe after scanning PBT. For whole breast or chest wall ± regional lymph nodes PBT, 1344 adverse events were reported (19 studies, 933 patients). After scanning PBT, 4% (44/1026) of events were severe. The most prevalent severe outcome after scanning PBT was dermatitis, which occurred in 5.7% (95% confidence interval, 4.2-7.6) of patients. Other severe adverse outcomes included infection, pain, and pneumonitis (each ≤1%). Of the 141 reconstruction events reported (13 studies, 459 patients), the most prevalent after scanning PBT was prosthetic implant removal (34/181, 19%).

conclusionsThis is a quantitative summary of all published clinical outcomes after adjuvant PBT for early breast cancer. Ongoing randomized trials will provide information on its longer-term safety compared with standard photon radiation therapy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsProton TherapyFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID36868521
PMCPMC7615202
OpenAlexW4322753458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.