ReviewAmerican journal of human genetics2023
Facing Our History-Building an Equitable Future.
Review in American journal of human genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Racial and socioeconomic disparities in genetic evaluation and testing in the adult patient population.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- How to turn "minority tax" into "minority capital".Genetics in medicine open · 2026Review
- Autism ableism seen through research abstract contents: A mixed-methods analysis of language in NIH-funded genetic and genomic autism research.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2025Article
- Review
- Grade Disparities Associated with Student Demographics in Upper-Division Biology Courses Across Multiple Institutions.CBE life sciences education · 2025Article
- 2024 ASHG presidential address: Incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity: Old concepts, new urgency.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Experience using conventional compared to ancestry-based population descriptors in clinical genomics laboratories.American journal of human genetics · 2025Review
- Design and implementation of an action plan for justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion within the Clinical Genome Resource.American journal of human genetics · 2025Review
- Why Revise When We Should Reconcile?The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2025Article
- Challenging Misconceptions about Race in Undergraduate Genetics.CBE life sciences education · 2024Article
- Promoting equity in polygenic risk assessment through global collaboration.Nature genetics · 2024Review
- Managing differential performance of polygenic risk scores across groups: Real-world experience of the eMERGE Network.American journal of human genetics · 2024Review
- Review
- Community engagement in genetics and genomics research: a qualitative study of the perspectives of genetics and genomics researchers in Uganda.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- The legacy of language: What we say, and what people hear, when we talk about genomics.HGG advances · 2023Article
- On the report of the ASHG "Facing Our History-Building an Equitable Future" initiative.American journal of human genetics · 2023Review
- Celebrating excellence, acknowledging past harms: Both are vital parts of ASHG's continuing journey to advance human genetics.American journal of human genetics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This report is the product of a major year-long initiative to acknowledge and reckon with past injustice, as well as progress toward justice, within the American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) and the broader field of human genetics. Approved by the ASHG Board of Directors and launched in 2021, the initiative was sparked by the social and racial reckonings in 2020. The ASHG Bboard of Directors asked ASHG to acknowledge and provide examples of how human genetics theories and knowledge "have been used to feed and justify racism, eugenics, and other systemic forms of injustice, and to focus specifically on examples of ASHG's role in fostering or failing to rebuke harms and on steps the Society could take to address findings." The initiative was undertaken with support and input from an expert panel of human geneticists, historians, clinician-scientists, equity scholars, and social scientists and included a research and environmental scan, four expert panel meetings, and a community dialogue as its main activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.